2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of arterial hypertension in the very elderly: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

Abstract: The benefits of lowering blood pressure are obvious for the population up to the age of 65 years, but whether and, if so, which treatment is beneficial in the very elderly population remains still a matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials with duration of at least 12 months and the analysis of cardio- and cerebrovascular endpoints in participants aged 75 years and over. MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and the WHO-ISH Collaboratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Also, in a similar meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (total n: 8,667) recruiting hypertensive patients aged ≥75 years, antihypertensive medications did not yield any significantly reduced all-cause mortality. 43 However, both meta-analyses showed that treatment decreased CV events, stroke, and heart failure. 42,43 Although evidence supporting the hypertension paradox is not as vigorous as the support around obesity or cholesterol paradoxes, the latest Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults recommended a 10-point higher SBP (150 mmHg instead of the traditional 140) as the goal of treatment among adults aged ≥60 years; in addition, the guideline did not make any recommendation for a BP goal among people aged ≥70 years with moderately to severely reduced kidney function (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ).…”
Section: Blood Pressure: Is Hypertension Advantageous?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Also, in a similar meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (total n: 8,667) recruiting hypertensive patients aged ≥75 years, antihypertensive medications did not yield any significantly reduced all-cause mortality. 43 However, both meta-analyses showed that treatment decreased CV events, stroke, and heart failure. 42,43 Although evidence supporting the hypertension paradox is not as vigorous as the support around obesity or cholesterol paradoxes, the latest Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults recommended a 10-point higher SBP (150 mmHg instead of the traditional 140) as the goal of treatment among adults aged ≥60 years; in addition, the guideline did not make any recommendation for a BP goal among people aged ≥70 years with moderately to severely reduced kidney function (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ).…”
Section: Blood Pressure: Is Hypertension Advantageous?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis of clinical trials showed that treatment of hypertension in older adults is as beneficial as that in younger adults [11, 12]. It is well established now that the treatment of hypertension in elderly patient was associated with a reduction in the rate of fatal or nonfatal stroke, a reduction in the rate of death from stroke, a reduction in the rate of death from any cause, a reduction in the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, and a reduction in the rate of heart failure [12, 13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another large-scale meta-analysis demonstrated the relevance of BP to cardiovascular mortality in the population aged 40–89 years, but the contribution of high BP to cardiovascular mortality decreases with advancing age 16. Further, a 2011 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in hypertensive patients aged 75 years and older concluded that treatment reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates and the incidence of heart failure, even though the total mortality rate was not affected 17. Opinion on treating the very elderly (≥80 years) was divided until the results of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial18 were published in 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%