2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures with Achillon device: Clinical outcomes and kinetic gait analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with other studies which has reported that 85% to 100% patients returned to their recreational activities. [19][20][21] This further supports surgical management is equally good in our setup like others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is consistent with other studies which has reported that 85% to 100% patients returned to their recreational activities. [19][20][21] This further supports surgical management is equally good in our setup like others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Longo et al also confirmed excellent biomechanical performance and stability with an Achillon–like suture configuration [21]. Garrido et al and Feldbrin et al reported highly satisfactory clinical results with the Achillon® device [10, 23]. In the present study, the Achillon® suture guide provided excellent results; it facilitated tendon healing and avoided surgical complications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Post-treatment sport activity measurements incorporated both function and physical activity as a secondary outcome [24]. In other studies that assessed minimally invasive Achilles tendon surgery, a majority of patients returned to the pre-injury activity level [10, 23]. For example, Guillo et al and Talbot et al reported that 80 % and 74 % of patients, respectively, had returned to pre-operative activity levels [17, 26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In percutaneous techniques, although the risk of wound problems is lower, the risk of nerve injuries and repeat rupture is higher. However, the minimally invasive technique theoretically reduces the incidence of wound problems and the risk of repeat rupture (21)(22)(23). Guillo et al (24) conducted prospective studies of minimally invasive techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%