“…MMP, firstly described by Altug and Arslan [10], was presented to be an effective maxillary protractor to correct maxillary deficiency [18]. In addition, the authors reported that the MMP was smaller, lacked of the long vertical bar of conventional FM, and had minimal disadvantages in growing patients [17]. However, there was limited information about the soft tissue effects of this appliance [16] and the comparison of its effects with a conventional FM/ RME was neglected in the literature.…”