2010
DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.52.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of a young adult with Class III malocclusion using a modified mini maxillary protractor: a case report

Abstract: We describe the treatment of a young adult male (aged 14 years 9 months) with Class III malocclusion using a mini maxillary protraction appliance, and discuss the results. The patient was treated with an acrylic cap splint-type expander and a modified maxillary protractor until a positive overjet was achieved. Edgewise fixed appliances were used to align the teeth. The treatment resulted in Class I molar occlusion, an ideal overjet, overbite and incisor angulation. A Class I molar relationship was achieved aft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MMP, firstly described by Altug and Arslan [10], was presented to be an effective maxillary protractor to correct maxillary deficiency [18]. In addition, the authors reported that the MMP was smaller, lacked of the long vertical bar of conventional FM, and had minimal disadvantages in growing patients [17]. However, there was limited information about the soft tissue effects of this appliance [16] and the comparison of its effects with a conventional FM/ RME was neglected in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MMP, firstly described by Altug and Arslan [10], was presented to be an effective maxillary protractor to correct maxillary deficiency [18]. In addition, the authors reported that the MMP was smaller, lacked of the long vertical bar of conventional FM, and had minimal disadvantages in growing patients [17]. However, there was limited information about the soft tissue effects of this appliance [16] and the comparison of its effects with a conventional FM/ RME was neglected in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the appliance has a long vertical bar in front of the face, and thus, it has aesthetic disadvantages [17]. MMP, firstly described by Altug and Arslan [10], was presented to be an effective maxillary protractor to correct maxillary deficiency [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%