2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer patients by quantification and KRAS genotyping of circulating cell-free DNA

Abstract: Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has continuously improved over the last decade. However, disease monitoring remains underdeveloped and mostly dependent on imaging e.g. RECIST 1.1 criteria. The genetic landscape of individual cancers and subsequently occurring treatment-induced evolution remain neglected in current surveillance strategies. Novel biomarkers demand minimally invasive and repetitive tracking of the cancer mutagenome for therapy stratification and to make prognostic predictions. Car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(66 reference statements)
4
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition cfDNA levels in the STS patients were shown to positively correlate with patient disease burden, but only fairly weakly (R 2 =0.26). In other malignancies the strength of this correlation varies [ 19 , 20 ], and interestingly when those patients in our cohort with evidence of ctDNA were analysed separately, the strength of the correlation seen rose (see Figure 2 ) suggesting that a significant proportion of cfDNA in these cases was both tumour derived and released into the circulation in a linear correlation with disease burden. During the follow up period six of the 11 patients enrolled died of their disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In addition cfDNA levels in the STS patients were shown to positively correlate with patient disease burden, but only fairly weakly (R 2 =0.26). In other malignancies the strength of this correlation varies [ 19 , 20 ], and interestingly when those patients in our cohort with evidence of ctDNA were analysed separately, the strength of the correlation seen rose (see Figure 2 ) suggesting that a significant proportion of cfDNA in these cases was both tumour derived and released into the circulation in a linear correlation with disease burden. During the follow up period six of the 11 patients enrolled died of their disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…One study on advanced lung cancer found no significant correlation between cfDNA and metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis as estimated by positron emission tomography/ computed tomography [20]. Others have found that baseline cfDNA levels in treatment naive mCRC patients correlate with radiologic disease burden, but this trend could not be observed at time of disease progression and subsequent therapy lines [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 5032 studies were excluded after primary screening, and 94 articles were selected for further assessment of eligibility. By rigorous evaluation, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in our present meta‐analysis. In the study reported by Taly and another study by Xu, KRAS status was detected by two different methods, and Morgan detected KRAS status both in serum and plasma, and the data from two different methods and two samples were analyzed as two independent studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%