Abstract:Purpose The purpose of the current study was to assess the clinical and radiological results after locking T-plate osteosynthesis with coracoclavicular augmentation of unstable and displaced distal clavicle fractures (Neer type 2). Methods Thirty patients, treated between January 2007 and January 2010 were followed up after a median followup time of 12.2 months (range 4.7-37.2). The Constant and DASH scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcome, and anterior-posterior and 30°cephalic view radiographs were… Show more
“…We observed a high rate of union (97.2 %) and a low complication rate (5.6 %) using this treatment strategy. Our results were compatible with the results of literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and only one nonunion occurred in six months in our series. Although the functional shoulder score showed no difference between the distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook plate groups, the distal clavicular locking plate group had greater ability to return to their previous work in three months after surgery compared to the clavicular hook plate group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies have reported excellent results of distal clavicle fractures treated with locking plate [14,15,17,26,29,30]. Treatment for unstable distal clavicle fractures using a locking T-plate and a CC PDS (polydioxansulfate) cerclage can provide good and reliable clinical results and a 100 % union rate [16]. Internal fixation with a 2.4-mm distal clavicle T-plate, coracoclavicular ligament repair, and augmentation of the ruptured coracoclavicular ligaments using a PDS cord holds anatomic reduction and allows early full mobilization of the injured shoulder girdle to accomplish a fast return of shoulder function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since not all studies reported the functional outcome scores of the distal clavicle fractures and they used different functional evaluation instruments, it was difficult to analyse and compare the function between the different treatment modalities. Consequently, we reviewed and compared the functional outcome scores evaluated by Constant score between the hook plate group (nine studies) [6,7,[9][10][11][12][13]31, present study] and the locking plate group (eight studies) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]30, present study] in distal clavicle fractures. The mean Constant scores were 91.9 and 93.6 in the hook plate and locking plate groups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there is a wide variety of surgical techniques for the treatment for these fractures. If surgery of distal clavicle fractures is indicated, many implants or surgical methods are available, including Kirschner wires [3], coracoclavicular screw fixation [4,5], hook plate fixation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], or locking plate fixation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Although there are many types of operative procedures, no procedures are considered to be the gold standard treatment.…”
“…We observed a high rate of union (97.2 %) and a low complication rate (5.6 %) using this treatment strategy. Our results were compatible with the results of literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and only one nonunion occurred in six months in our series. Although the functional shoulder score showed no difference between the distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook plate groups, the distal clavicular locking plate group had greater ability to return to their previous work in three months after surgery compared to the clavicular hook plate group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies have reported excellent results of distal clavicle fractures treated with locking plate [14,15,17,26,29,30]. Treatment for unstable distal clavicle fractures using a locking T-plate and a CC PDS (polydioxansulfate) cerclage can provide good and reliable clinical results and a 100 % union rate [16]. Internal fixation with a 2.4-mm distal clavicle T-plate, coracoclavicular ligament repair, and augmentation of the ruptured coracoclavicular ligaments using a PDS cord holds anatomic reduction and allows early full mobilization of the injured shoulder girdle to accomplish a fast return of shoulder function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since not all studies reported the functional outcome scores of the distal clavicle fractures and they used different functional evaluation instruments, it was difficult to analyse and compare the function between the different treatment modalities. Consequently, we reviewed and compared the functional outcome scores evaluated by Constant score between the hook plate group (nine studies) [6,7,[9][10][11][12][13]31, present study] and the locking plate group (eight studies) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]30, present study] in distal clavicle fractures. The mean Constant scores were 91.9 and 93.6 in the hook plate and locking plate groups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there is a wide variety of surgical techniques for the treatment for these fractures. If surgery of distal clavicle fractures is indicated, many implants or surgical methods are available, including Kirschner wires [3], coracoclavicular screw fixation [4,5], hook plate fixation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], or locking plate fixation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Although there are many types of operative procedures, no procedures are considered to be the gold standard treatment.…”
“…2,4,6,7,9,20 The techniques used can be classified according to the plane of fixation into: 1) horizontal fixation in the form of K-wires, either transarticular across the acromioclavicular joint or extraarticular, using a hook plate 15 ; or locking plates; 2) vertical fixation in the form of coracoclavicular screws, 21 suture anchors 17 or tension band wires 4 ; and 3) a combination of both horizontal and vertical fixation in the form of plates augmented with tension bands or coracoclavicular screws. 10,[22][23][24] In this study we used the UCAC loop for acute distal clavicle fractures, and achieved excellent results with no major complications. This simple technique produced anatomical reduction and provided adequate fixation to hold the medial clavicle in proximity to the lateral fragment in order to achieve union.…”
In Neer type II (Robinson type 3B) fractures of the distal clavicle the medial fragment is detached from the coracoclavicular ligaments and displaced upwards, whereas the lateral fragment, which is usually small, maintains its position. Several fixation techniques have been suggested to treat this fracture. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with type II distal clavicle fractures treated with coracoclavicular suture fixation using three loops of Ethibond. This prospective study included 14 patients with Neer type II fractures treated with open reduction and coracoclavicular fixation. Ethibond sutures were passed under the coracoid and around the clavicle (UCAC loop) without making any drill holes in the proximal or distal fragments. There were 11 men and three women with a mean age of 34.57 years (29 to 41). Patients were followed for a mean of 24.64 months (14 to 31) and evaluated radiologically and clinically using the Constant score. Fracture union was obtained in 13 patients at a mean of 18.23 weeks (13 to 23) and the mean Constant score was 96.07 (91 to 100). One patient developed an asymptomatic fibrous nonunion at one year. This study suggests that open reduction and internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures using UCAC loops can provide rigid fixation and lead to bony union. This technique avoids using metal hardware, preserves the acromioclavicular joint and provides adequate stability with excellent results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.