2003
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment failure in invasive aspergillosis: susceptibility of deep tissue isolates following treatment with amphotericin B

Abstract: The difficulty in treating IA may not be because of the susceptibility of the isolates, but because of poor penetration of antifungal agents into infected tissue. Aspergillus spp. invade blood vessels causing thrombosis and tissue infarction, and therefore it may be difficult for antifungal drugs to exceed MICs in infected tissues. This highlights the need for different treatment strategies, such as surgery and the administration of cytokines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, clinical failure in invasive aspergillosis may have many causes other than drug resistance; furthermore, in patients who have died from inva-sive aspergillosis despite amphotericin treatment, emergence of resistance to amphotericin or itraconazole during treatment has not been detected (65,207). In a review of 11 patients with hematologic malignancies in whom A. fumigatus or A. flavus was isolated, while on amphotericin, resistance to amphotericin was not detected, but it was thought that poor drug penetration to the site of infection may have been a contributor to failure (238).…”
Section: Management In Vitro Susceptibility To Antifungal Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical failure in invasive aspergillosis may have many causes other than drug resistance; furthermore, in patients who have died from inva-sive aspergillosis despite amphotericin treatment, emergence of resistance to amphotericin or itraconazole during treatment has not been detected (65,207). In a review of 11 patients with hematologic malignancies in whom A. fumigatus or A. flavus was isolated, while on amphotericin, resistance to amphotericin was not detected, but it was thought that poor drug penetration to the site of infection may have been a contributor to failure (238).…”
Section: Management In Vitro Susceptibility To Antifungal Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. fumigatus is usually highly susceptible to amphotericin B in vitro, with a MIC of Ͻ1 g/ml. For A. fumigatus and A. flavus, failure of amphotericin B may be related to poor drug penetration as well as decreased MIC for some isolates (16). Resistance to itraconazole is uncommon but is associated with clinical failure and failure in animal models (6,24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liposomal amphotericin B (32,33) and voriconazole (34-36) are common drugs in prophylactic use to prevent fungal infections in high-risk patients, although treatment failure and breakthrough of invasive fungal infections have been observed (2,37,38). Furthermore, echinocandins generally show good in vitro effectiveness against Candida and Aspergillus species, and several retrospective studies on the efficacies of micafungin and caspofungin in prophylactic and therapeutic approaches showed similar efficacies to those observed for various azoles and amphotericin B (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of 595 patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis identified a high rate of treatment failure for a wide range of antifungal drugs (36%), with only 27% of treated patients demonstrating a complete response to treatment (1). While in some cases failure of treatment may result from low susceptibility of the pathogen to the respective antifungal, restricted delivery to the site of infection may be another reason for a limited treatment response (2). Therefore, practice guidelines addressing treatment choices support the aggressive use of different drugs, including amphotericin B and its lipid formulation as well as different azoles, including itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, at the highest recommended doses (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%