The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-115817
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Failure After Image-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Renal Tumors – A Systematic Review with Description of Type, Frequency, Risk Factors and Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our complication rate of 5.5% is within the range of the 5.1–37% reported by the Vollherbst et al Systematic review [24]. RNS and tumor diameter were larger in the cases with complications, however no significant difference was found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our complication rate of 5.5% is within the range of the 5.1–37% reported by the Vollherbst et al Systematic review [24]. RNS and tumor diameter were larger in the cases with complications, however no significant difference was found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We observed a 6.7% tumor persistence rate, which is slightly higher than the 5.9% reported in the systematic review performed by Vollherbst et al [24] but lower than the 13% reported by Ptsuka et al [25]. We observed that tumor median size was significantly higher in patients with persistence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adverse events of ethiodized oil tumor marking and IRE were collected and classified under the updated standards of the Society of Interventional Radiology [ 30 ]. For the radiological follow-up, two major endpoints for local treated HCCs were defined based on LI-RADS 2018: endpoint-1—residual unablated tumor that was defined in the initial follow-up imaging demonstrated to be residual HCC at the ablative margin (LR-TR), endpoint-2—local tumor progression that was defined after at least one contrast-enhanced radiological follow-up study documenting an absence of viable tumor tissue in/around the target-HCC, new HCC foci appeared at the edge of the IRE zone (LR-TR) in further follow-up [ 21 , 25 , 31 ]. Both endpoint-1 and endpoint-2 were defined as treatment failures [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the radiological follow-up, two major endpoints for local treated HCCs were defined based on LI-RADS 2018: endpoint-1—residual unablated tumor that was defined in the initial follow-up imaging demonstrated to be residual HCC at the ablative margin (LR-TR), endpoint-2—local tumor progression that was defined after at least one contrast-enhanced radiological follow-up study documenting an absence of viable tumor tissue in/around the target-HCC, new HCC foci appeared at the edge of the IRE zone (LR-TR) in further follow-up [ 21 , 25 , 31 ]. Both endpoint-1 and endpoint-2 were defined as treatment failures [ 31 ]. A radiological interpretation of the endpoints was performed by two radiologists together (with more than ten and eight years of experience, respectively, in abdominal radiology).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%