2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01697.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment effects of high‐dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation

Abstract: Summary. Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a serious complication of sepsis that is associated with a high mortality. Objectives: Using the adapted International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) diagnostic scoring algorithm for DIC, we evaluated the treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin (AT) in patients with severe sepsis with or without DIC. Patients and Methods: From the phase III clinical trial in severe sepsis (KyberSept), 563 patients were identified (placebo, 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
266
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
12
266
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The KyberSept trial390 assessed severe sepsis rather than sepsis‐associated DIC, and so could not be adopted as evidence for this CQ, as it does not consider treatments for sepsis patients without DIC. Thus a post‐hoc analysis in a study by Kienast et al .,402 which was limited to sepsis‐associated DIC, was adopted. Meanwhile, the efficacy and risks of the dosage covered by the National Health Insurance for the intervention itself (1,500 units/day for patients with sepsis‐associated DIC with antithrombin activity levels of 70% or lower, and 40–60 units/kg in surgical cases) were also assessed.…”
Section: Cq16: Diagnosis and Treatment Of Disseminated Intravascular mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KyberSept trial390 assessed severe sepsis rather than sepsis‐associated DIC, and so could not be adopted as evidence for this CQ, as it does not consider treatments for sepsis patients without DIC. Thus a post‐hoc analysis in a study by Kienast et al .,402 which was limited to sepsis‐associated DIC, was adopted. Meanwhile, the efficacy and risks of the dosage covered by the National Health Insurance for the intervention itself (1,500 units/day for patients with sepsis‐associated DIC with antithrombin activity levels of 70% or lower, and 40–60 units/kg in surgical cases) were also assessed.…”
Section: Cq16: Diagnosis and Treatment Of Disseminated Intravascular mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, four Japanese and overseas studies395, 402, 403, 404 were analyzed. The treatment intervention was expected to be beneficial in terms of reduced mortality rate based on an RR of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49–0.93), but bias risk/indirectness may lower the reliability of the effect estimate.…”
Section: Cq16: Diagnosis and Treatment Of Disseminated Intravascular mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the post‐hoc subgroup analyses of those RCTs indicated that the anticoagulant therapies resulted in improved mortality rates in patients with sepsis‐induced DIC 8, 9. In Japan, anticoagulant therapy has been approved for use as adjunctive therapy for patients with sepsis‐induced DIC and is now widely applied in clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 There have been some sepsis studies that demonstrate improved survival in patients whose AT activity is enhanced with high dose AT therapy instead of heparin administration. 65 Newer anticoagulant drugs are designed around several mechanisms: (1) preventing the initiation of coagulation, (2) decreasing thrombin generation, and (3) directly inhibiting thrombin interactions. Newer pharmaceuticals designed to block the initiation of coagulation include tifacogin and NAPc2.…”
Section: Antithromboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%