2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2237-60892012000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment dropout at a secondary mental health service

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate mental health dropout rates in secondary care and to identify possible associations between this variable and social, demographic, psychopathologic, and health care process-related variables. METHOD: This prospective, observational study included 994 patients referred to a secondary service by four primary care units and evaluated by a specialist mental health team between 2004 and 2008. The dependent variable was treatment dropout. Bivariate analyses investigated possible association… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulted data show that factors influencing psychiatric treatment dropout range from purely psychiatric to purely social, as well as overlaps between them (Osterberg and Blaschke, 2005). On the other hand, literature and studies in other countries sometimes provide different conclusions and also contradictory conclusions about dropout rates and predictors (Ribeiro et al, 2012), which may also indicate that in different cultures and conditions the evaluation of a situation should probably be started from different assumptions (Reneses et al, 2009). Data for this evaluation have been gathered only in one hospital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The resulted data show that factors influencing psychiatric treatment dropout range from purely psychiatric to purely social, as well as overlaps between them (Osterberg and Blaschke, 2005). On the other hand, literature and studies in other countries sometimes provide different conclusions and also contradictory conclusions about dropout rates and predictors (Ribeiro et al, 2012), which may also indicate that in different cultures and conditions the evaluation of a situation should probably be started from different assumptions (Reneses et al, 2009). Data for this evaluation have been gathered only in one hospital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2021;17:e3020. doi: 10.18294/sc.2021.3020 39,2% (43) ; 25,6% (44) , 37,6% (45) . La excepción fue Villeneuve et al (46) , que en su metaanálisis con 74 estudios, obtuvieron una tasa de abandono del tratamiento psicosocial entre pacientes diagnosticados con esquizofrenia del 13%.…”
Section: Abandono Del Tratamientounclassified