TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT IN PSYCHODYNAMIC INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY (HOBSON'S ‘CONVERSATIONAL MODEL’) FOR CHRONIC TREATMENT RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA: TWO SINGLE CASE STUDIES
Abstract:Two cases are presented from a project to develop psychodynamicinterpersonal (PI) therapy (Hobson's`Conversational Model') with long-term severe schizophrenia treated in a locked setting. We present two cases from a treatment development project including a description of the model and its use in this setting with some (anonymized) details of the therapy. The ward milieu can act as a container for disturbed dynamics during psychotherapy, but the lack of progress prior to the psychotherapy suggests that there i… Show more
“…However, successful family interventions incorporating psychodynamic principles or techniques have been carried out in both Scandinavia and the US (e.g. Levene, Newman, & Jefferies, 1989Tuori et al, 1998), and reports have begun to appear in British psychotherapy literature reporting on successful exploratory use of psychodynamicinterpersonal interventions with people with schizophrenia (Davenport, Hobson, & Margison, 2000).…”
Section: Examples Of Investigator Allegiance From the Schizophrenia Lmentioning
This article argues that psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia could be developed by being informed by research from the wider psychotherapy literature. We specifically argue that research on these interventions has ignored two key themes from this wider literature: first, the contention that differing models of intervention broadly result in similar outcomes, known as the 'equivalent outcomes paradox'; and second, the phenomenon of 'investigator allegiance' whereby the conclusions that may safely be drawn from comparative research are compromised by researchers' unwitting bias. We present evidence indicating that both these themes from the wider literature may be applicable to the literature on psychological interventions for schizophrenia and that schizophrenia treatment research should incorporate some of the lessons already learned in studies of other disorders. We conclude by arguing that psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia should be based on unbiased evidence and that interpretation of the evidence base should not be hindered by dogma or ideology from any quarter.
“…However, successful family interventions incorporating psychodynamic principles or techniques have been carried out in both Scandinavia and the US (e.g. Levene, Newman, & Jefferies, 1989Tuori et al, 1998), and reports have begun to appear in British psychotherapy literature reporting on successful exploratory use of psychodynamicinterpersonal interventions with people with schizophrenia (Davenport, Hobson, & Margison, 2000).…”
Section: Examples Of Investigator Allegiance From the Schizophrenia Lmentioning
This article argues that psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia could be developed by being informed by research from the wider psychotherapy literature. We specifically argue that research on these interventions has ignored two key themes from this wider literature: first, the contention that differing models of intervention broadly result in similar outcomes, known as the 'equivalent outcomes paradox'; and second, the phenomenon of 'investigator allegiance' whereby the conclusions that may safely be drawn from comparative research are compromised by researchers' unwitting bias. We present evidence indicating that both these themes from the wider literature may be applicable to the literature on psychological interventions for schizophrenia and that schizophrenia treatment research should incorporate some of the lessons already learned in studies of other disorders. We conclude by arguing that psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia should be based on unbiased evidence and that interpretation of the evidence base should not be hindered by dogma or ideology from any quarter.
“…Another example where therapeutic community principles have been modified and adapted for those with severe mental illness is Davenport's work in Salford in a secure setting with patients with poorresponse schizophrenia (Davenport, 1997(Davenport, , 2000. Particular attention is given to potentially harmful interactions between the dynamics of the psychosis itself, early experiences of abuse and the psychology of the institution.…”
Section: Therapeutic Communities For Severe Mental Illnessmentioning
The term ‘therapeutic community’ is usually used in the UK to describe small cohesive communities where patients (often referred to as residents) have a significant involvement in decision-making and the practicalities of running the unit. Based on ideas of collective responsibility, citizenship and empowerment, therapeutic communities are deliberately structured in a way that encourages personal responsibility and avoids unhelpful dependency on professionals. Patients are seen as bringing strengths and creative energy into the therapeutic setting, and the peer group is seen as all-important in establishing a strong therapeutic alliance. The flattened hierarchy and delegated decision-making are sometimes misunderstood as anarchy by outsiders. However, staff in modern therapeutic communities are deeply aware of the need for strong leadership and their responsibility to provide a safe ‘frame’ for therapeutic work (Association of Therapeutic Communities, 1999).
“…1999). Of potential value with people with schizophrenia (Davenport et al . 2000), and people with early Alzheimer’ disease (Brierley et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, everyone was adamant that they were enthusiastic about continuing to use the model in their own practice and wanting to participate in future developments associated with the model.Group members wanted to disseminate the model as a way of working with people with non‐psychotic enduring mental health problems.We also plan to begin using the model with people with psychotic disorders as there is an emerging literature in this area (Davenport et al . 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also plan to begin using the model with people with psychotic disorders as there is an emerging literature in this area (Davenport et al . 2000).…”
Current mental health policy documents highlight the need for mental health nurses to become increasingly involved in the delivery of evidence-based psychological interventions. However, substantial evidence exists indicating that there is a paucity of training to adequately equip nurses to deliver these interventions and, even when training is available, there are barriers to their implementation into routine clinical practice. This paper reports on the personal reflections and experiences of a group of four mental health nurses undertaking training in the Conversational Model of psychotherapy (also known as psychodynamic-interpersonal 'PI' psychotherapy). These reflections highlight the rewards and challenges arising from the effort to undertake training in an evidence-based model of psychological intervention and from attempting to implement and sustain this training into routine practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.