2019
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.07.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment delays during FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No validated ANC level has been established for safety. 2,4,5,19 Despite this, we have shown that physicians in the community use this strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No validated ANC level has been established for safety. 2,4,5,19 Despite this, we have shown that physicians in the community use this strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A retrospective chart review was carried out for every patient receiving mFOLFOX6 in the curative setting (oxaliplatin 85mg/m 2 IV day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV day 1, 5FU 400mg/m 2 IV day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m 2 All comers at both sites with pathology confirming early-stage colon or rectal cancer, as well as completely resected metastatic cases receiving mFOLFOX6 in the adjuvant setting in the above time frames were included. There was no institutional protocol mandating chemotherapy dose delay, dose modification, or the use of G-CSF based on lab values.…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6,7 Reductions in dose intensity due to dose modifications, dose delays, or chemotherapy discontinuation may compromise treatment efficacy, 8 and treatment delays can also present a substantial burden to patients, with the need to reschedule visits leading to inefficiencies and greater costs to health care systems. 9 Moreover, supportive care interventions are lineage specific, are often used reactively, and are each associated with risks and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%