2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment decisions in stable coronary artery disease: Insights from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization

Abstract: In the hospitals that participated in the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization, treatment decisions in stable coronary artery disease were largely in agreement with professional guidelines and determined by multiple factors. Most important deviations between guideline recommendations and clinical practice were seen in patients with extensive coronary disease, impaired left ventricular function, and diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…had undergone invasive evaluation for angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes and who had verified CAD in other European hospitals. 26,27 Hence, our findings should be generalizable to other CAD populations, primarily to patients with stable CAD. The power of the trial was less than planned because of lower event rates than anticipated and shorter follow-up than planned, the latter due to premature study termination of 692 participants (22%).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…had undergone invasive evaluation for angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes and who had verified CAD in other European hospitals. 26,27 Hence, our findings should be generalizable to other CAD populations, primarily to patients with stable CAD. The power of the trial was less than planned because of lower event rates than anticipated and shorter follow-up than planned, the latter due to premature study termination of 692 participants (22%).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Currently and at variance with European reports [41], patients with CAD receive more recommendations for PCI and fewer recommendations for CABG treatment than indicated in the U.S. guidelines [42] depending on non-angiographic as well as angiographic factors [43].…”
Section: Guidelines and Appropriateness Revascularization Criteriamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6 Some argue that revascularization should be reserved only for symptom relief. 5,7,8 Criteria for the appropriate use of revascularization have been developed to aid in clinical decision-making; however, a substantial proportion of revascularization procedures for stable ischemic heart disease are performed under clinical circumstances deemed as "uncertain." 9,10 Reflecting this uncertainty, there is wide regional variation in the rate of coronary revascularization, [11][12][13] which suggests different thresholds for invasive therapy for stable ischemic heart disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%