2017
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment decisions for MRSA in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): when is enough, enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, mean FEV 1 was 1.52% lower (95% CI: −2.98 to −0.06) for every 1-year of age, in agreement with earlier findings. 23 , 24 Thus, older and thinner children are at greater risk for poor lung function, with a mean FEV 1 value that is half of that in younger patients with normal BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, mean FEV 1 was 1.52% lower (95% CI: −2.98 to −0.06) for every 1-year of age, in agreement with earlier findings. 23 , 24 Thus, older and thinner children are at greater risk for poor lung function, with a mean FEV 1 value that is half of that in younger patients with normal BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New-generation antibiotics treatment may eradicate the bacterial infection and improve the patients' lung condition, but continuous antibiotic treatment makes bacteria develop resistance to drugs and eventually cause the failure of major commercial antibiotics [2][3][4]. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the severe antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, imposing more difficulties on treating CF patients [5][6][7]. MRSA infection elevated shockingly to the 25% of the CF population in the USA in 2015 [8], and higher risk factors for MRSA infection CF patients were identified afterwards [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited experience in the field of MRSA eradication in CF, other studies are definitively necessary. Large-scale studies designed to compare the clinical efficacy of various types of treatments are theoretically feasible [41] but the growing number of patients involved in clinical trials may make it difficult to recruit the number of subjects necessary to reach statistical power. Moreover, running clinical trials on MRSA new infection is made more difficult because of absence of data on MRSA prevalence in certain countries, the need to treat patients with antibiotics potentially active against MRSA and the lack of a universally accepted definition of eradication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%