Treatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges—A retrospective study comparing narrow‐diameter implants in pristine bone with standard‐diameter implants in augmented bone

Schiegnitz, Eik; Kämmerer, Peer W.; Hellwich, Philipp; König, Jochem; Sagheb, Keyvan; Al‐Nawas, Bilal

doi:10.1111/clr.13807

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…In this study, no implant loss occurred. This result was in line with the retrospective comparative data, where the survival rates were 96.1% for NDI and 95.6% for SDI with horizontal bone augmentation after a mean follow‐up of 37–42 months (Schiegnitz et al, 2021). Moreover, the high survival rate of NDI in our study supported its alternative use in the posterior jaws (Assaf et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Recently, a retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of NDI in pristine bone and SDI in augmented bone (Schiegnitz et al, 2021). The result showed similar survival and success rate outcomes of NDI and SDI with mixed indications and type of restorations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical evaluation of narrow‐diameter implants versus standard‐diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three‐year results of a randomized controlled trial

Zhang

Liu

Qian

et al. 2022

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The aim of this study was to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of narrow-diameter implants (NDI) with standard-diameter implants (SDI) in conjunction with lateral bone augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws. Materials and Methods:Fifty patients were included and randomly assigned into two groups: Patients in Group 1 received NDI (Ø3.5 mm); patients in Group 2 received SDI (Ø4.3 mm) with simultaneous lateral bone augmentation. Implant survival rates, complications, crestal bone loss, peri-implant conditions, treatment cost, and patient satisfaction were compared.Results: Three patients dropped out the follow-up. No implant loss was observed. The difference in technical complication rates between the two groups was 3.8% (95% CI: −13.7% to 21.3%). No significant differences in crestal bone loss were found between two groups at 3-year follow-up (0.55 ± 0.76 vs 0.41 ± 0.41 mm, p = .429). A total of 20.8%(5/24) of NDI were diagnosed with mucositis and 8.3% (2/24) with peri-implantitis. A total of 17.4% (4/23) of SDI showed mucositis and (1/23) 4.3% showed peri-implantitis.The total cumulative cost of treatment per patient in Group 1 (2849.6 USD, 95% CI: 2726.8-2972.4) was significantly lower than that in Group 2 (3581.4 USD, 95% CI, 3460.9-3701.9) over the 3-year follow-up (p < .01). The patient satisfaction rating of operation was significantly higher in Group 1 (85.42 ± 7.41 vs 80.48 ± 7.95, p = .033).Discussion: NDI yielded favorable implant survival, acceptable technical and biological complications, and high patient satisfaction supporting single crowns in the atrophic posterior region after 3-year follow-up. NDI might be a reasonable alternative in horizontally deficient posterior jaws.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical evaluation of narrow‐diameter implants versus standard‐diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three‐year results of a randomized controlled trial

Zhang

Liu

Qian

et al. 2022

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In another retrospective study, NDIs are compared to SDI with guided bone regeneration. Clinical results also suggest similar rates of survival and success, making NDIs placement a good option (Schiegnitz et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…similar rates of survival and success, making NDIs placement a good option (Schiegnitz et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Narrow diameter titanium–zirconium tissue‐level implants supporting multi‐unit FDPs in the anterior area: A 5‐year prospective study

Altuna

Fernández-Villar

Barroso-Panella

et al. 2023

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Narrow diameter implants (NDIs) are used in cases of limited mesio‐distal space, or if the alveolar ridge does not allow placement of a standard diameter implant. Purpose The aim of this prospective case series study is to present the 5‐year clinical‐, radiological‐, and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients with partial edentulism in the anterior area of the jaws requiring the placement of two narrow diameter implants to support a 3‐ or 4‐unit fixed partial denture (FPD). Materials and Methods Thirty partially edentulous patients missing 3 or 4 adjacent teeth in the anterior area of the jaws were included in the study. Two titanium–zirconium tissue‐level NDIs were placed in each patient in healed anterior sites (60 implants). A conventional loading protocol was performed to provide a FPD. Implant survival, success, marginal bone‐level changes (MBL), clinical parameters, buccal bone stability with CBCT, adverse events and PROMs were recorded. Results The survival and success rates for the implants were 100%. The mean MBL (±SD) after prosthesis delivery, and 5‐year follow‐up (mean 58.8 months; range: 36–60) was 0.12 ± 0.22 and 0.52 ± 0.46 mm, respectively. Decementation and screw loosening were the most frequent prosthetic complications, yielding a prosthetic survival and success rates of 100% and 80%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was high with a mean (±SD) score of 89.6 ± 15.1. Conclusions The use of tissue‐level titanium–zirconium NDIs supporting splinted multi‐unit FPDs in the anterior area seems to be a safe and predictable treatment option after a 5‐year follow‐up period.

show abstract

Clinical outcomes of narrow- and regular-diameter implants with bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang,

Wen,

Dong

2024

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges—A retrospective study comparing narrow‐diameter implants in pristine bone with standard‐diameter implants in augmented bone

Abstract: The data from this study are part of the dissertation work submitted to Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz as part of doctoral thesis of Philipp Hellwich.

Cited by 4 publications

References 38 publications

Clinical evaluation of narrow‐diameter implants versus standard‐diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three‐year results of a randomized controlled trial

Clinical evaluation of narrow‐diameter implants versus standard‐diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three‐year results of a randomized controlled trial

Narrow diameter titanium–zirconium tissue‐level implants supporting multi‐unit FDPs in the anterior area: A 5‐year prospective study

Clinical outcomes of narrow- and regular-diameter implants with bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About