2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment and Outcomes of Fungal Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review of 225 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of the causative organism of the PJI before choosing the surgical strategy is critical, as previous research has reported that for certain MDR or XDR Gramnegative organisms, DAIR is associated with higher failure rates compared to two-stage revision, regardless of surgical timing [73]. Similar findings have been reported in fungal PJI, with DAIR being a risk factor for PJI recurrence compared to two-stage revision [64]. α Reflects data from the entire cohort study, not specific to this treatment strategy; β described by authors as one-stage, classified as DAIR plus since the stems were not revised; γ authors described that 44% (14/32) of the two-stage revisions had incomplete removal (at least one well fixed stem); δ authors assessed treatment success rate by surgery rather than by patient (restricted to the first treatment of the PJI).…”
Section: Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (Dair)mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification of the causative organism of the PJI before choosing the surgical strategy is critical, as previous research has reported that for certain MDR or XDR Gramnegative organisms, DAIR is associated with higher failure rates compared to two-stage revision, regardless of surgical timing [73]. Similar findings have been reported in fungal PJI, with DAIR being a risk factor for PJI recurrence compared to two-stage revision [64]. α Reflects data from the entire cohort study, not specific to this treatment strategy; β described by authors as one-stage, classified as DAIR plus since the stems were not revised; γ authors described that 44% (14/32) of the two-stage revisions had incomplete removal (at least one well fixed stem); δ authors assessed treatment success rate by surgery rather than by patient (restricted to the first treatment of the PJI).…”
Section: Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (Dair)mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…While studies in conventional joint arthroplasty have highlighted worse outcomes in Gram-negative and fungal PJI [64,65], the impact of microorganism profile on treatment success rates of megaprostheses PJI remains unknown. Furthermore, the few studies available on the subject are characterized by a heterogeneous population and the lack of controlling for potential confounders [36,66,67].…”
Section: Microbiology Of Pji In Megaprosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist field. Ten of the 22 items of the STROBE checklist were used in accordance with previous studies in the orthopaedic literature [116][117][118][119][120] . Each item was graded on a scale of 0 to 2, with 2 points being used in well-described items, 1 point in partly described items, and 0 points in poorly described items.…”
Section: Assessment Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 10 articles that did not use a comparator group, we used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist field in accordance with previous orthopaedic literature [49][50][51]. For this checklist, 10 of the 22 items were used.…”
Section: Assessment Of Study Quality Assessment and Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%