2010
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2010.tb10071.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment alternatives for compliance with the Stage 2 D/DBPR: An economic update

Abstract: A concise review of the standard treatment technologies used to achieve compliance with the Stage 2 Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule (D/DBPR), along with their respective advantages and disadvantages, is presented in this article. Capital and operating cost estimates for D/DBPR compliance, first released in 2005 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, are updated. As many utilities have found, switching to a disinfectant other than chlorine may be effective in limiting regulated disinfection byp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in TOC will generally result in an increase in chlorine demand which will in turn create an increase in DBP formation [6][7][8][9]. If precursors to DBP formation in the system are not maintained properly it could result in a failure to meet the Stage 2 DPBR in 2012.…”
Section: Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in TOC will generally result in an increase in chlorine demand which will in turn create an increase in DBP formation [6][7][8][9]. If precursors to DBP formation in the system are not maintained properly it could result in a failure to meet the Stage 2 DPBR in 2012.…”
Section: Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason it is manufactured at water treatment facilities by plasma discharge, which has become a more prevalent method of water treatment [9]. Chlorine treatment is generally accepted as being more economical than ozone treatment [10], although this position has been disputed by the ozone water treatment community [11]. This has driven researchers towards improving the efficacy of the ozone treatment process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning January 2012, the Stage 2 Disinfection By-product Rule (DBPR) will mandate stringent regulations as to the amount of DBPs that will be present in finished drinking water [9]. Research suggests that reduced total organic carbon (TOC), a subset of natural organic matter, will produce less DBPs in the distribution system [8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. If the biological GAC, or GAC post-adsorption, can further decrease the amount of TOC that is present in finished drinking water then GAC may prove to be a costeffective option after all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%