1996
DOI: 10.1080/1057356960120107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Acceptability: A Critical Dimension for Overcoming Teacher Resistance to Implementing Adaptations for Mainstreamed Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perceived acceptability, effectiveness, and differential appropriateness (i.e., function-treatment match) of interventions will likely play a key role in applying such strategies with students, echoing the points made earlier that intervention fidelity and effectiveness are likely to be higher when social validity (i.e., acceptability) is high (Cross-Calvert & Johnston, 1990;Hawkins, 1991). Data on this point support the position that perceived acceptability and actual compliance with intervention strategies are positively related (Gajria & Salend, 1996;Reimers, Wacker, Cooper, & DeRaad, 1992). To move toward such an approach requires considerable time and collaborative effort (yet another factor that impacts favorably on intervention acceptability; Kutsick et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The perceived acceptability, effectiveness, and differential appropriateness (i.e., function-treatment match) of interventions will likely play a key role in applying such strategies with students, echoing the points made earlier that intervention fidelity and effectiveness are likely to be higher when social validity (i.e., acceptability) is high (Cross-Calvert & Johnston, 1990;Hawkins, 1991). Data on this point support the position that perceived acceptability and actual compliance with intervention strategies are positively related (Gajria & Salend, 1996;Reimers, Wacker, Cooper, & DeRaad, 1992). To move toward such an approach requires considerable time and collaborative effort (yet another factor that impacts favorably on intervention acceptability; Kutsick et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Several researchers have identified the treatment acceptability as a key factor in decisions to use an intervention (see Finn & Sladeczek, 2001). Additionally, treatment acceptability has been linked to educators' use and nonuse of interventions (Gajria & Salend, 1996). The present investigation provides support for the contribution of perceptions about the effectiveness of a technology-based treatment in interventionists' intention to use that treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Additionally, he noted that social validity concerns the perceived effectiveness of an intervention. A component of social validity that has received a significant amount of attention in the literature on intervention implementation is treatment acceptance (Finn & Sladeczek, 2001;Gajria & Salend, 1996). According to Kazdin (1980), treatment acceptability concerns a consumer's judgment "of whether treatment procedures are appropriate, fair, and reasonable for the problem or client" (p. 483).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of research on accommodations has been undertaken with respect to external assessment, there are some findings based on assessment practices of classroom teachers. Surveys have found that both special education and general education teachers have limited knowledge of the range of available accommodations, and report limiting their practice to those accommodations they consider easy to use, such as reading written instructions aloud to individual students (Gajria, Salend, & Hemrick, 1994;Putnam, 1992;Siskind, 1993). Furthermore, some teachers express reluctance to make use of accommodations, citing difficulty of implementation, possible threats to the academic integrity of their assessments, and fairness to other students as reasons for such omissions (Gajria, Salend, & Hemrick, 1994;Jayanthi, Epstein, Polloway, & Bursuck, 1996;Siskind, 1993).…”
Section: Delivery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%