2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icsm.2015.7332521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating software quality as a first-class entity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topics investigated are impact on software 2 We did not include the 21 papers selected in the pilot study and 46 tentatively accepted papers in this paper due to the space constraints. We will include them in our extended paper Improve the skills of newcomer developers [50] Measure the performance of modern code review and a method to study linux-style reviews [34] Address challenges in modern code review process when conducted by third-part organization [32] Allow developers to explain their code using voice and video [26] Remove stagnation from modern code review [87] Analyse how code changes affect test code [52] Assist mining modern code review data by enabling better understand of dataset context and identifying abnormalities [75] Automatically identify factors that confuse reviewers [18] Automatically partition composite changes and then facilitate modern code reviews [72] Cleaner modern code review [41] Modern code review driven by software quality concerns [81] Collect modern code review data, generate metrics and provide ways to access the metrics and data [10] Community-based modern code review [98] Determine how code changes should be ordered to facilitate modern code reviews (increase cognitive support) [6] Estimate modern code review effort based on patch size and complexity [45] Explore the need for a new generation tool of modern code review tools [4] Focus on design quality concerns [82] Choose pre-or post-commit modern code reviews [5] Identify problems with modern code review processes [24] Identify security problems with web-based systems [14] Improve modern code review process within organization [15] Peer modern code review [31] Retrieve modern code review data [23] Summarize similar changes and detect missing or inconsistent edits [97] Support the modern code review of visual programming languages [60] Track modern code review performance [33] Use of mobile to review source code [21] Use of social networks for frequent modern code reviews …”
Section: Impact And/or Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics investigated are impact on software 2 We did not include the 21 papers selected in the pilot study and 46 tentatively accepted papers in this paper due to the space constraints. We will include them in our extended paper Improve the skills of newcomer developers [50] Measure the performance of modern code review and a method to study linux-style reviews [34] Address challenges in modern code review process when conducted by third-part organization [32] Allow developers to explain their code using voice and video [26] Remove stagnation from modern code review [87] Analyse how code changes affect test code [52] Assist mining modern code review data by enabling better understand of dataset context and identifying abnormalities [75] Automatically identify factors that confuse reviewers [18] Automatically partition composite changes and then facilitate modern code reviews [72] Cleaner modern code review [41] Modern code review driven by software quality concerns [81] Collect modern code review data, generate metrics and provide ways to access the metrics and data [10] Community-based modern code review [98] Determine how code changes should be ordered to facilitate modern code reviews (increase cognitive support) [6] Estimate modern code review effort based on patch size and complexity [45] Explore the need for a new generation tool of modern code review tools [4] Focus on design quality concerns [82] Choose pre-or post-commit modern code reviews [5] Identify problems with modern code review processes [24] Identify security problems with web-based systems [14] Improve modern code review process within organization [15] Peer modern code review [31] Retrieve modern code review data [23] Summarize similar changes and detect missing or inconsistent edits [97] Support the modern code review of visual programming languages [60] Track modern code review performance [33] Use of mobile to review source code [21] Use of social networks for frequent modern code reviews …”
Section: Impact And/or Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%