2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating multifocal humerus fractures: A comparison between the mipo technique and intramedullary nailing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The advantages of this technique include reducing iatrogenic damage to the soft tissues surrounding the fracture site and minimizing postoperative scar formation, thereby meeting patients' aesthetic requirements. 18,19 However, there are also some drawbacks associated with the MIPO technique in practical clinical operations. 20 First, the biggest challenge in implementing the MIPO technique is the difficulty of achieving closed reduction of the fracture, often necessitating the use of fluoroscopy images to prevent harm to both the patient and the surgeon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The advantages of this technique include reducing iatrogenic damage to the soft tissues surrounding the fracture site and minimizing postoperative scar formation, thereby meeting patients' aesthetic requirements. 18,19 However, there are also some drawbacks associated with the MIPO technique in practical clinical operations. 20 First, the biggest challenge in implementing the MIPO technique is the difficulty of achieving closed reduction of the fracture, often necessitating the use of fluoroscopy images to prevent harm to both the patient and the surgeon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%