2006
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating erectile dysfunction when PDE5 inhibitors fail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
68
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more than 30% of diabetic patients with ED do not respond to PDE-5 inhibitor therapy. For these patients, endogenous NO production may be so impaired that inhibition of cGMP degradation does not provide a significant benefit (McMahon et al, 2006). Currently, two different classes of drugs have been developed that directly target sGC, increasing cGMP formation and promoting penile erection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more than 30% of diabetic patients with ED do not respond to PDE-5 inhibitor therapy. For these patients, endogenous NO production may be so impaired that inhibition of cGMP degradation does not provide a significant benefit (McMahon et al, 2006). Currently, two different classes of drugs have been developed that directly target sGC, increasing cGMP formation and promoting penile erection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported 62% prescription renewal rate at 3-4 months of follow-up, which drops to approximately 30% by 6-12 months, suggests that patients stop taking the drug for reasons other than treatment failure. 2,3 The use of PDE-5 inhibitors may result in side effects, such as visual disturbance, headache, facial flushing, rhinitis and indigestion. Other treatments for ED include injection therapy within the penis or penile implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives include vacuum-constriction devices and intracavernosal injection of vaso-active drugs (both level 1C evidence). Finally, although not discussed in this chapter, for those patients failing to respond to any pharmaco or physical therapies, referral to a urologist for the consideration of penile prosthesis might be considered (38). Similarly, patients with local and structural penile abnormalities such as Peyronie's disease warrant referral to a urologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For those men who do not respond to oral PDE-5 inhibitors alone, there is some logic in combining agents (17,38), although direct evidence from randomized controlled trials is still lacking (level 1C evidence). Alternatives include vacuum-constriction devices and intracavernosal injection of vaso-active drugs (both level 1C evidence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation