1989
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating Drunk Drivers with Moral Reconation Therapy: A One-Year Recidivism Report

Abstract: 115 convicted drunk drivers were treated with Moral Reconation Therapy during their incarceration. Postrelease recidivism (rearrest) and convictions of these treated subjects was compared to a control group of 65 convicted drunk drivers who did not receive treatment due to limited bed space. Analysis showed a rearrest rate of 20% for the treated group during the first year of the program's operation compared to 27.6% for the control group during the same period. Subjects who participated in a structured afterc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second high-quality quasi-experimental design evaluated the effects of MRT on convicted drunk drivers in a southern state (Little & K. D. Robinson, 1989;Little, K. D. Robinson, & Burnette, 1990, 1991a, 1993aLittle, K. D. Robinson, Burnette, & Swan, 1995a). The study included 115 convicted drunk drivers in a county jail who agreed to participate in a treatment program compared with 65 convicted drunk drivers who volunteered but were not selected due to limited treatment slots.…”
Section: Moral Reconation Therapy (Mrt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second high-quality quasi-experimental design evaluated the effects of MRT on convicted drunk drivers in a southern state (Little & K. D. Robinson, 1989;Little, K. D. Robinson, & Burnette, 1990, 1991a, 1993aLittle, K. D. Robinson, Burnette, & Swan, 1995a). The study included 115 convicted drunk drivers in a county jail who agreed to participate in a treatment program compared with 65 convicted drunk drivers who volunteered but were not selected due to limited treatment slots.…”
Section: Moral Reconation Therapy (Mrt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluations of MRT for drunk drivers produced two general findings (see Table 1). First, the treatment group, as compared with the control group, consistently demonstrated a lower rearrest rate for any offense over the course of the studies (Little et al, 1990(Little et al, , 1991bLittle & Robinson, 1989c), and in a recent study, this difference was statistically significant (Little et al, 1995b). Second, the treatment group, as compared with the control group, also had a consistently lower reincarceration rate over time (Little et al, 1990(Little et al, , 1991b(Little et al, , 1993b, and this difference was also significant in a recent evaluation (Little et al, 1995b).…”
Section: Mrtmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the studies did not report attempts to control for extraneous variables. The three early studies (Little et al, 1990(Little et al, , 1991bLittle & Robinson, 1989c) received a methods score of 2 on the Maryland scale primarily because there was no use of statistical significance tests. The two most recent studies were rated a 3 because the researchers employed significance tests (Little et al, 1993b(Little et al, , 1995b.…”
Section: Mrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One series of studies provides some evidence that training in moral reasoning may be effective in increasing traffic safety, in this case, reducing repeat drunk driving (Little & Robinson, 1989a, 1989cLittle, Robinson, & Burnette, 1990). The authors, who developed the moral reasoning program, treated a sample of prison inmates convicted of drunk driving during their incarceration.…”
Section: Moral Education and Traffic Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%