2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.12475
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating Bugs as Features: A compositional guide to the statistical analysis of the microbiome-gut-brain axis

Abstract: There has been a growing acknowledgement of the involvement of the gut microbiomethe collection of microbes that reside in our gut -in regulating our mood and behaviour. This phenomenon is referred to as the microbiota-gut-brain axis. While our techniques to measure the presence and abundance of these microbes has been steadily improving, the analysis of microbiome data is non-trivial.Here, we present a guidebook for the analysis and interpretation of microbiome experiments with a focus on microbiome-gut-brain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To correct for multiple testing in tests involving microbiome features, the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) post-hoc was performed with a q-value of 0.1 used as a cutoff for species and 0.2 for functional modules. Plotting was done using the ggplot2 [57] and patchwork [58] libraries in R. Custom R scripts and functions are available online at https://github.com/thomazbastiaanssen/ Tjazi [59]. A linear modelling approach was used to test for a group effect on taxonomic and functional differences, whilst adjusting for covariates including age, sex, BMI, exercise and dietary differences.…”
Section: Taxanomic and Functional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct for multiple testing in tests involving microbiome features, the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) post-hoc was performed with a q-value of 0.1 used as a cutoff for species and 0.2 for functional modules. Plotting was done using the ggplot2 [57] and patchwork [58] libraries in R. Custom R scripts and functions are available online at https://github.com/thomazbastiaanssen/ Tjazi [59]. A linear modelling approach was used to test for a group effect on taxonomic and functional differences, whilst adjusting for covariates including age, sex, BMI, exercise and dietary differences.…”
Section: Taxanomic and Functional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found associations solely using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and not with Unifrac or Weighted Unifrac. Since Bray-Curtis dissimilarity measures unshared microbial abundances and Unifrac in turn unshared microbial taxas between two samples and Weighted Unifrac takes into account both abundances and taxas (Bastiaanssen et al, 2022) differing results here could be explained by the difference of these indices. Our results refer to differences in microbial abundances instead of specific taxas in relation to negative reactivity for boys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We used several batch-correction and transformation methods on the NH22 data instead of the voom-SNM normalization. Methods for data transformation included: Centered-Log Ratio 25 [CLR] (with zero values offset to 1), CLR_C 26 , a variant of CLR that imputes zero counts, Relative abundance, and voom 20 . voom was utilized after log-CPM transformation and quantile normalization as in NH22 and P20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%