Treating apraxia of speech (AOS) with EMA-supplied visual augmented feedback

Katz, William F.; McNeil, Malcolm R.; Garst, Diane

doi:10.1080/02687030903518176

Cited by 42 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the current review 5 of the 10 experiments (from the seven studies) focused on the effects of feedback frequency on speech motor learning. These studies included three RCTs (Adams & Page, 2000;Adams, Page, & Jog, 2002;Steinhauer & Grayhack, 2000) and two SPD research studies (Hula, Robin, Maas, Ballard, & Schmidt, 2008;Katz, McNeil, & Garst, 2010).…”

Section: Frequency Of Feedback (High Vs Reduced Amount)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It is well documented in limb motor research that providing the optimal practice and feedback conditions can have positive outcomes for the learning of new movements. However, it remains unclear if the training conditions used for limb movements can be directly applied to the speech motor system of healthy adults and individuals with acquired motor speech disorders. Collectively these practice and feedback conditions are known as the principles of motor learning (PML), and they have recently been applied to the rehabilitation of motor speech disorders with promising results. Aims: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify which PML have been examined in the speech motor learning literature, to determine the effectiveness of these principles, and to ascertain future lines of research. Methods & Procedures:A systematic search of the literature was completed that involved the combination of a primary search term with a secondary search term. All articles were independently reviewed and scored by the first two authors. To guide the selection process strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented. Additionally, authors used a 15-category evidence-rating system to judge the overall quality of each study. After the study was scored, points were totalled into an overall quality rating of high, intermediate, or low with respect to methodological rigour and interpretability.Outcomes & Results: Seven articles met inclusion criteria, including three randomised controlled trials and four single-participant designs. Five of the articles focused on motor speech disorders, including investigations of apraxia of speech (four studies) and hypokinetic dysarthria from Parkinson's disease (one study), while two studies focused on speech motor performance in healthy adults. Five of the articles were judged to be of high quality while two were judged to be of intermediate quality.Conclusions: Although limited, the current level of evidence for the application of the PML to speech motor learning in both healthy adults and individuals with motor speech disorders is promising and continued investigation is warranted.

show abstract

Section: Frequency Of Feedback (High Vs Reduced Amount)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although PML have been increasingly utilized in AOS treatment studies, there have been only a few investigations designed to examine the effects of specific principles (e.g., Austermann Katz, McNeil, & Garst, 2010;Knock, Ballard, Robin, & Schmidt, 2000;Maas, Barlow, Robin, & Shapiro, 2002;.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sound Production Treatment: Effects of Blocked and Random Practice

Wambaugh

Nessler

Wright

et al. 2014

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Visual feedback has been shown to facilitate accurate productions in children with CAS (Preston, Brick, & Landi, 2013) and adults with AOS (Katz et al, 2007;Katz, McNeil, & Garst, 2010). Feedback may be particularly effective for promoting the consolidation of robust feedforward programs through, for example, errorless learning (e.g., Fillingham, Hodgson, Sage, & Lambon Ralph, 2003).…”

Section: Ongoing Reliance On Feedback By Children With Casmentioning

confidence: 98%