2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treadmill walking improves walking speed and distance in ambulatory people after stroke and is not inferior to overground walking: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…96 Better recovery of walking speed and distance in ambulatory patients was observed with TT. 97 Gait in electromechanical-assisted training associated with physiotherapy after stroke promotes a greater chance of achieving independent walking than physiotherapy without these devices. 98 Three months after stroke, participants who were not ambulatory seemed to benefit most from this type of intervention.…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…96 Better recovery of walking speed and distance in ambulatory patients was observed with TT. 97 Gait in electromechanical-assisted training associated with physiotherapy after stroke promotes a greater chance of achieving independent walking than physiotherapy without these devices. 98 Three months after stroke, participants who were not ambulatory seemed to benefit most from this type of intervention.…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 We rated evidence from the high-quality level and downgraded it one point if one of the following prespecified criteria was present: low methodological quality (defined as > 50% of trials with PEDro score < 6); inconsistency of estimates among pooled studies ( I 2 > 50%) or when estimation was not possible (no pooling); indirectness of participants (defined as > 50% of trials not reporting time since stroke or baseline level of upper limb disability); and imprecision (pooling < 300 participants per outcome). 21 Two reviewers (LFG and MSB) assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE system, with potential disagreements resolved by discussion with a third reviewer (LRN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke Impact Scale or Assessment of Life Habits or Brief Assessment of Social Engagement). 21 The timing of the measurements and the procedure used to measure the outcomes were recorded to assess the appropriateness of combining studies in a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We downgraded the score from high quality by one level each time one of the following pre-specified criteria was present: low methodological quality (if the majority of studies in the meta-analysis had high risk of bias); inconsistency of estimates between pooled studies (I 2 >50%), or when assessment was not possible (no pooling); indirectness of participants (I 2 >50% of the studies did not describe the inclusion criteria); and imprecision (pooling> 400 participants for each outcome). 18 Two reviewers (Yu Wu and Feilong Zhu) assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations system, with potential disagreements resolved by consensus with a third reviewer (Ming Zhang).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%