2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, among hip arthroplasty patients, BWSTT had a positive effect on muscle strength, gait symmetry, and Harris score, suggesting that treadmill walking has the potential to improve gait-related outcomes among patients who undergo hip surgery. 16 Despite these positive observations among hip arthroplasty patients, there were distinct differences between that study by Hesse et al 16 and the current one; patients in that study were excluded if older than 75 years or if they were unable to walk with reciprocal crutches, whereas in the current study the average age of BWSTT participants was 79 years, and many had limited mobility at baseline. Further, because the current study was focused primarily on feasibility, the intensity and frequency of the training in the current study were lower and were based on participant tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, among hip arthroplasty patients, BWSTT had a positive effect on muscle strength, gait symmetry, and Harris score, suggesting that treadmill walking has the potential to improve gait-related outcomes among patients who undergo hip surgery. 16 Despite these positive observations among hip arthroplasty patients, there were distinct differences between that study by Hesse et al 16 and the current one; patients in that study were excluded if older than 75 years or if they were unable to walk with reciprocal crutches, whereas in the current study the average age of BWSTT participants was 79 years, and many had limited mobility at baseline. Further, because the current study was focused primarily on feasibility, the intensity and frequency of the training in the current study were lower and were based on participant tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…15 A randomized controlled trial comparing 10 days of BWSTT to conventional therapy after total hip arthroplasty demonstrated significant improvements in Harris score (pain and mobility), muscle strength, and gait symmetry in favor of BWSTT, and these improvements persisted after 12 months. 16 However, the population of hip arthroplasty patients includes mainly patients with osteoarthritis, a population that is very different with respect to age and other health-related characteristics than patients with hip fracture. Whether BWSTT is feasible among patients with hip fractures remains to be determined.…”
Section: Hip Fractures; Physical Therapy Techniques; Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review performed by the author (manuscript submitted for publication) on level 1 evidence-(randomised controlled trials) for regimes for rehabilitation after THR found the use of PRT to be predictive of functional benefit, when measured either using objective measures such as muscle strength or subjective functional measures such as the WOMAC. These centrebased interventions (Hesse et al, 2003;Husby et al, 2009;Jesudason et al, 2002;Liebs et al, 2010;Suetta et al, 2004) were performed in the early period (<1 month following surgery) and the home-based interventions (Jan et al, 2004;Trudelle-Jackson et al 2004) were performed late (>1 month following surgery). A limitation of the home-based interventions assessed in the literature is that follow-up does not extend beyond the end of the exercise interventions periods.…”
Section: The Evidence For Post-operative Home or Centre-based Exercismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El sistema permite ejercitar la marcha de forma rítmica y repetitiva. Este tipo de tratamiento se presenta como más completo ya que, reduce la carga que debe desplazar el paciente durante la marcha y permite dar un numero de pasos por sesión mayor que el ECM (Hesse et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified