Traveling concepts: Performative movements in learning/playing

Abstract

This paper examines the generative interplay between learning and playing in managing and organizing by taking a performative approach that theorizes learning/playing as an assemblage in which playing and learning emerge as co-evolving processes in practice. Addressing the methodological challenges associated with this performative approach, the learning/playing assemblage is probed using travelling concepts, which attend to the dynamic movements rather than the stabilities of organizing, functioning as proposed by Vygotsky as both a research tool and an emergent result of research. This notion of 'travelling concepts' is developed empirically by engaging with Mead's 'sociality', which he defined as the simultaneous experience of being several things at once. Three interweaving strands of sociality-relational, spatial, and temporal-are elaborated in the context of travelling with and through four artisan food production sites, each of which sought to engage differently with the aesthetics and functionality of the food we consume.

Exploring the embodied subtleties of collaborative creativity: What organisations can learn from dance

“…Sensitivity towards others and oneself could – and, ideally, does – enable more open and plurivocal conversations in organisations about difficult and sensitive issues. As Simpson et al (2018) argue, relational sociality can be understood as an imaginative engagement with others’ experiences, as if one is the other, bringing an embodied and emotional level to collaboration that is crucial for learning. The next section discusses the potential applications of our finding that learning physically evolves as a process between bodies.…”

Must I Grow a Pair of Balls to Theorize about Theory in Organization and Management Studies?

“…Barbara Simpson, Rory Tracey and Alia Weston (2018) offer another approach to ‘theorizing’ through travelling concepts , a form of ‘empirical sensitization’ and interpretive engagement of researchers and research participants with the features, flow and dynamics of their experience and with emerging meanings and insights: theorizing through paying attention to the fluidity of meaning-making in lived experience. These forms of theorizing are very different to the abstracted counterfactual technique of challenging existing theories and using contrastive questioning to develop ‘plausible alternative conceptual representations’ (Joep Cornelissen & Rodolph Durand, 2014, p. 1004), which privilege academic sensemaking.…”

Identity Work in Developing Collaborative Leadership

“…However, by virtue of their dynamic nature, these movements are difficult to apprehend in the orthodox sense of stable representational constructs. Rather than resorting to conventional and over-privileged methods of identity research such as interviewing to capture individuals' retrospective reflections (Carroll, 2016), we propose the use of traveling concepts (Simpson, Tracey, & Weston, 2018) that can shift and morph as movements evolve. Traveling concepts reflect the recent 'mobility turn' in social research (Urry, 2007) that seeks new ways of engaging with the continuously emergent and performative qualities of social and relational action.…”