Introduction: the policy context Heightened concerns over climate change, gasoline prices, and congestion have sparked research into the influences of urban form and land-use patterns on motorized travel, notably vehicle miles traveled (VMT). VMT per capita is widely viewed as the strongest single correlate of environmental degradation and resource consumption in the transport sectoröas individuals log more and more miles in motorized vehicles, the amount of local pollution (eg particulate matter) and global pollution (eg greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions) increases, as does the consumption of fossil fuels, open space, and other increasingly scarce resources.Recent policy initiatives have further fueled interest in this subject. In California, where ground transportation is responsible for 38% of greenhouse gases, state legislators recently passed the Global Warming Solution Act (Assembly Bill 32, AB32) that calls for a 25% reduction in GHG emissions below the trend line by 2020, or to 1990 levelsöin total, the elimination of 169 million tonnes of carbon dioxide and other GHGs. Cities and counties that fail to make a good-faith effort to achieve this target risk losing state transportation funding.Controversy reigns over how climate-change targets might be met in states like California. Within the transport sector, one view holds that GHG-reduction targets can best be achieved through`sustainable mobility': for example, the introduction of low-carbon fuels and new technologies that increase fuel efficiency so that Americans can continue driving their cars at will, albeit with far less GHG emissions. At the other end of the spectrum are those arguing for`sustainable urbanism': for example, redesigning our cities and regions so there is less need to drive and, if one does, driving can be done over shorter distances and more efficiently (eg consolidate trips at one-stop mixed-use centers). Leading this conservation charge are new urbanists, environmentalists, and other advocates of smart growth who contend that a bane of modern-day living is excessive dependency on the private car. Creating more walkable, transit-friendly, urban landscapes, they contend, will not only reduce VMT and