James Gibbons Huneker was an influential cultural critic inthe decades around 1900. His idiosyncratic style has lead to his work being somewhat overlooked. This article relates Huneker's collection of New York travel sketches, New Cosmopolis (1915), to other examples of literary impressionism, and specifically to the work of J.K. Huysmans, Stephen Crane and Henry James. It then argues that New Cosmopolis moves beyond the aestheticism and detached analysis of the impressionistic literary sketch towards a more subjective, engaged form of city writing. This led Huneker to an urban aesthetic and to an embrace of cosmopolitanism comparable to the ideas celebrated in Paul Rosenfeld's Port of New York (1924). Rosenfeld argues that the writers and artists he profiles, including Randolph Bourne, Alfred Stieglitz and William Carlos Williams, represent a flowering of 'new expression' in America. Huneker's relationship to these modern, progressive figures is, in part, attributable to his tendency towards spontaneous, idiosyncratic and highly subjective statements and his recognition of the visceral sensory experiences provided by New York's tango halls, movie theatres and Coney Island roller coasters.In James Gibbons Huneker's broad conception of culture, the arts of food, beer and conversation were granted the same attention and respect as painting, literature and music. In person and in print Huneker delighted in opinionated, iconoclastic statements. He was overstretched by journalistic assignments, and prone to digression, gossip, jokes, and long lists of names and allusions. These traits make his writing frustrating to read and difficult to take seriously. It is, however, these same traits of digressive inconsistency, unchecked subjectivity and openness to the full range of sensory experience that made Huneker an astute observer of early-twentiethcentury New York City.