2020
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel, Time, and Cost Savings Associated with a University Medical Center's Video Medical Interpreting Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the possible use of telemedicine should be viewed as a factor of strategic importance in pre‐anaesthetic nursing consultations. For example, the field of anaesthesiology has benefited greatly from this technology since 2004, both in rural settings and in metropolitan areas, with high rates of user satisfaction, fewer appointment cancellations, greater financial savings and no reduction in the quality of health services or outcomes (Sigal et al., 2020). Nevertheless, nursing professionals and health institutions are urged to share their knowledge, successes and shortcomings in order to improve existing instruments, to enable the design of comprehensive protocols, to facilitate the analysis of patient selection, to determine the satisfaction of patients and healthcare providers, to assess equipment reliability and performance and to guarantee the security of confidential health information (Bridges et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the possible use of telemedicine should be viewed as a factor of strategic importance in pre‐anaesthetic nursing consultations. For example, the field of anaesthesiology has benefited greatly from this technology since 2004, both in rural settings and in metropolitan areas, with high rates of user satisfaction, fewer appointment cancellations, greater financial savings and no reduction in the quality of health services or outcomes (Sigal et al., 2020). Nevertheless, nursing professionals and health institutions are urged to share their knowledge, successes and shortcomings in order to improve existing instruments, to enable the design of comprehensive protocols, to facilitate the analysis of patient selection, to determine the satisfaction of patients and healthcare providers, to assess equipment reliability and performance and to guarantee the security of confidential health information (Bridges et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical plans developed via telemedicine visits remain unchanged after in-person examinations [16]. In addition, virtual airway evaluations, critical to the development of anesthesia intraoperative plans, have been found to have strong agreement with in-person airway evaluations [17]. Current medicine practice places a strong focus on objective skills and evaluations but the virtual visit can still provide much physical objective data, particularly visual in addition to objective studies such as echocardiograms and chest x-rays, which can be obtained after subjective histories and review of systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the 27 VMI studies, especially the more recent ones since 2012, there were two major strengths in the research design. First, these studies usually adopted large sample sizes (e.g., over 280, 000 medical encounters in [36]). Second, most of these studies operationalized its target construct into multiple indexes instead of a single index, and therefore these studies were able to obtain richer data and provide us with more informative findings.…”
Section: Review Of Research Designs and Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, two studies [26,27] that employed between-subject designs and used inferential statistics did not found significant difference in encounter time between VMI and on-site (or between VMI and telephone interpreting). A third study on this issue [36], which compared the encounter time between over 240, 000 cases of on-site interpreting and overall 32, 000 cases of VMI conducted in the same hospital, showed a shorter average encounter time in VMI than on-site (mean of on-site [SD] = 41.72 [36.1]; mean of VMI [SD] = 30.72 [26.0]). As this study did not use inferential statistics in data analyses, however, the present review was still not sure whether the encounter time in VMI was significantly shorter than on-site.…”
Section: Review Of Research Designs and Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%