Travel planning in men and women. Who is better?

Abstract

Gender differences are often reported in spatial abilities, most of the times favouring men. Even during wayfinding, which requires planning and decision-making, such as choosing roads to take or shortcuts, men are in general better and faster than women. Although different interpretations have been proposed to explain men’s advantage in navigation, no study has explored the possibility that it could be due to men’s better travel planning ability. This latter has been recently identified as a distinct kind of planning that allows implementing an efficient navigational strategy in accordance with the environmental features. Therefore, the present study was aimed at investigating gender differences in travel planning ability. We compared men and women in performing the Key Search Task that requires to implement a strategy to search for a lost object in a wide imagined space. Results showed that men outperform women in both the overall performance and in some specific indexes of the total score. Men had a better travel planning ability with respect to women, outperforming women in configuring the planned strategy and choosing the best point to enter the imagined field. Therefore, men seem to plan the best navigational strategy and appear more cognitively flexible than women in adapting the strategy at the environmental features. The two genders did not differ in the time spent to solve the task. This finding suggests that differences in travel planning skills can contribute in explaining gender differences in wayfinding and spatial orientation.

Do Advanced Spatial Strategies Depend on the Number of Flight Hours? The Case of Military Pilots

“…Moreover, Bocchi et al [7] found that the navigational style also affects the sense of direction (SOD). People with the survey style have a better sense of direction than people with the landmark or route styles (e.g., [37]) and are more proficient in solving navigational problems and in travel planning [38,39].…”

“Where am I?” A snapshot of the developmental topographical disorientation among young Italian adults

“…By analysing single cases reports, subjects are characterised by a different degree in terms of severity of illness and in terms of navigational impairment. Specifically, Case one had a severe deficit in the formation of the environment mental map [ 66 ]; FG had a normal acquisition of environmental information but a specific impairment in the retrieval with a loss of information after 5 minutes [ 69 ]; Dr. WAI and LA had both normal acquisition and retrieval of environmental information [ 70 , 73 ]. FG, LA, and Dr. WAI had deficits in mental representation, mental rotation and mental generation of environmental images.…”

Sex Differences in Spatial Memory: Comparison of Three Tasks Using the Same Virtual Context

“…Furthermore, there are a great number of factors related to the task design that must be considered to correctly interpret the spatial behavior, such as the environment [32]; the time available to memorize the scenery [31,33]; the level of difficulty [34][35][36][37]; the visual perspective taken of the scenery or alignment effect [33,[38][39][40]; and other individual variables, such as sex [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], age [47,48], cognitive styles [19,44,49], familiarity or degree of knowledge of the spatial context [50,51] and other psychological factors [32,35,42,43] that can modulate the final spatial behavior.…”