2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel beyond the home neighborhood for delinquent behaviors: Moderation of home neighborhood influences

Abstract: Neighborhood research indicates that adolescents are at higher risk for delinquency when they reside in neighborhoods low in collective efficacy, low in perceived prosocial norms and values, and high in availability of substances and firearms. However, as adolescents develop, they are more likely to independently travel during their day-to-day activities, and the effects of their home neighborhood may be weakened as they spend time in other communities. The current study surveyed 179 adolescents involved in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neighborhoods plagued with high levels of poverty, family disruption and residential instability tend to weaken these social networks and the children typically are affected by the lack of socialization (Turner, Hartman & Bishop, 2007). Collective efficacy is comprised of two components: social cohesion, the positive bonds formed between residents of the same neighborhood, and informal social control, the ability or willingness of neighborhood residents to monitor and/or intervene in activities occurring within the neighborhood (Tompsett, Amrhein & Hassan, 2014;Sampson, 1997). Collective efficacy emphasizes that residents who trust one another and have similar values will guide behavior and act on each other's behalf to enforce societal standards.…”
Section: Community Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Neighborhoods plagued with high levels of poverty, family disruption and residential instability tend to weaken these social networks and the children typically are affected by the lack of socialization (Turner, Hartman & Bishop, 2007). Collective efficacy is comprised of two components: social cohesion, the positive bonds formed between residents of the same neighborhood, and informal social control, the ability or willingness of neighborhood residents to monitor and/or intervene in activities occurring within the neighborhood (Tompsett, Amrhein & Hassan, 2014;Sampson, 1997). Collective efficacy emphasizes that residents who trust one another and have similar values will guide behavior and act on each other's behalf to enforce societal standards.…”
Section: Community Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective efficacy emphasizes that residents who trust one another and have similar values will guide behavior and act on each other's behalf to enforce societal standards. Collective efficacy is much more difficult to activate in areas marked by high rates of poverty and crime because the conditions of the environment discourage interaction amongst the residents (Tompsett, Amrhein & Hassan, 2014;Losel & Farrington, 2012;Sampson, 1997).…”
Section: Community Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations