The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel behavior of low-income residents: studying two contrasting locations in the city of Chennai, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
5
54
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the findings in this paper support previous studies from other cities in the global South, namely that there are significant differences in individuals travel behavior between districts within the same city; individuals in peripheral and sparsely settled areas travel longer distances, use private motor vehicles more often (for most or all trip purposes), cars in particular, and travel more frequently (Srinivasan and Rogers, 2005;Tanimowo, 2006;Naess, 2009;Wang et al, 2011;Shirgaokar, 2016). Comparisons between districts with different characteristics within the same urban area are useful as it enhances our understanding of how planning policies play out and takes on meaning within the city system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the findings in this paper support previous studies from other cities in the global South, namely that there are significant differences in individuals travel behavior between districts within the same city; individuals in peripheral and sparsely settled areas travel longer distances, use private motor vehicles more often (for most or all trip purposes), cars in particular, and travel more frequently (Srinivasan and Rogers, 2005;Tanimowo, 2006;Naess, 2009;Wang et al, 2011;Shirgaokar, 2016). Comparisons between districts with different characteristics within the same urban area are useful as it enhances our understanding of how planning policies play out and takes on meaning within the city system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It was claimed that people in the global South do not base their choices of residential location, destinations, and travel modes on their attitudes but mainly on income (Shirgaokar, 2016). Srinivasan and Rogers (2005) analyzed the differences in mode choice and trip frequency due to differences in accessibility to employment and services among 70 households in Chennai. They found that the differences in accessibility strongly affected travel behavior; residents in the centrally located area made more trips and were more likely to use non-motorized modes compared to residents in the periphery.…”
Section: Urban Transformation In the Global Southmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En específico, se ha documentado una menor disposición de automóviles, la carencia de infraestructura suficiente para la movilidad no motorizada, una menor cobertura de los servicios de transporte formal, y la aparición de operadores informales que establecen sus rutas preferentemente a lo largo de las principales, pero escasas carreteras que conectan con los centros urbanos (DIAZ OLVERA et al, 2013;SRINIVASAN et al, 2005). Es el transporte colectivo de autobuses y minibuses el que presta un servicio menos eficiente a las poblaciones periféricas, forzándoles a realizar trayectos más complejos y lentos (LAU, 2011: 235) Las inconveniencias se sienten especialmente los fines de semana, en franjas temporales cuando hay menos servicio del transporte colectivo (COVENEY et al, 2009;FARBER et al, 2014), cuando es más imprevisible el cumplimiento de los horarios (ETTEMA et al, 2005), o cuando se necesita ir de una zona periférica de la ciudad a otra igualmente periférica (LAU, 2011).…”
Section: Algunos Condicionantes Para La Accesibilidad Urbanaunclassified
“…El que los hogares más pobres gasten una más elevada proporción en transporte (DIAZ OLVERA et al, 2013) condiciona que sus miembros tengan que acceder a medios de transporte más lentos (LAU, 2011), en especial los motorizados (PLAUT, 2004;SRINIVASAN et al, 2005), y que muestren una tendencia a vivir en entornos urbanos compactos donde los servicios se encuentren próximos (LEWIS et al, 2010). Todo ello concurre en que para poder acceder a los servicios más básicos, las poblaciones marginadas de las periferias urbanas se vean obligadas a realizar traslados más largos (MASOUMI, 2014;DIAZ OLVERA et al, 2013), y en general, sin apenas opciones de locación y desplazamientos, se encuentran con serias dificultades para planificar viables estrategias de movilidad por la ciudad (SUSILO et al, 2014).…”
Section: Algunos Condicionantes Para La Accesibilidad Urbanaunclassified
“…The literature on transport-related exclusion provides insights into the relations between (lack of) transportation opportunities, spatial practices, and livelihoods. Its thrust is that residential locations removed from the city centre and its job opportunities result in isolation and poverty due to inaccessibility or high costs of transportation (Anand and Tiwari, 2006;Lucas, 2012;Olvera et al, 2008;Srinivasan et al, 2007;Srinivasan and Rogers, 2005;Ureta, 2008;Venter et al, 2007). Transport-related exclusion occurs when social and economic disadvantages overlap with insufficient access to transportation (Lucas, 2012).…”
Section: Planning For the Poor And Failure Of Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%