Abstract:Myriad factors have been found to have an impact on delinquent behavior and traumatic stress. This study proposes a model that tests the relationship between common predictors of delinquency (neighborhood condition, antisocial peer socialization, and exposure to violence) with traumatic stress. Serial mediation was used to test the relationships between these predictors and traumatic stress. Results indicate the mediation effect between neighborhood conditions and traumatic stress significantly reduces the tot… Show more
“…Social disorganization theory provides one framework for understanding the relationship between neighborhood structural disadvantage and adolescent dating violence. Another explanation to the association between concentrated disadvantage and dating violence may be that individuals within areas of disadvantage are at a higher risk for exposure to risk factors for dating violence, including being exposed to community violence, interpersonal violence, and traumatic stress (Benson, Fox, DeMaris, & Van Wyk, ; Black et al., ; Jaggers et al., ; Voith & Brondino, ). In addition, these structural neighborhood characteristics may impede the values and norms of a community: violence may be seen as expected, tolerated or necessary (Berg et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, adolescence is an important developmental period to consider the influence of neighborhoods, as youth spend an increasing amount of time in social contexts outside of their home (Leventhal, Depéré, & Brooks‐Gunn, ). Neighborhood structural characteristics (e.g., economic disadvantage) and social processes (e.g., social connection) influence adolescent engagement in risk‐related behaviors, educational outcomes, and physical and mental health outcomes, including traumatic stress (Jaggers, Prattini, & Church, ; Leventhal & Brooks‐Gunn, ; Leventhal et al., ). Structural characteristics of disadvantage, including economic status, residential mobility and family disruption, have consistently been associated with higher levels of violent outcomes in urban youth and adults (Romero, Richards, Harrison, Garbarino, & Mozley, ; Voith & Brondino, ).…”
Section: Neighborhoods and Adolescent Dating Violencementioning
The link between relationship violence and aspects of neighborhood concentrated disadvantage (e.g., percent of unemployed adults, percent of families below poverty level), has been established. However, the literature examining neighborhood social processes, including informal social control and social cohesion, in relation to adolescent dating violence has shown mixed results with a limited theoretical foundation and methodology. Using a social disorganization theoretical framework, this study examined the mediating role of these neighborhood social processes in the relation between concentrated disadvantage and adolescent dating violence within an urban context. Participants included 605 adult residents in 30 census tracts and 203 adolescents from neighborhoods on the West and South sides of Chicago. Neighborhood-level concentrated disadvantage was measured via Census data, adult residents reported on neighborhood social processes, and youth reported on dating violence. Informal social control was negatively associated with dating violence, and social cohesion was positively associated with dating violence. A multilevel mediation model showed that concentrated disadvantage was related to higher levels of dating violence via lower levels of informal social control. These results extend social disorganization theory to dating violence within an urban context, while also highlighting the important role of neighborhood processes on relationship violence. Implications for research and intervention programming are discussed.
“…Social disorganization theory provides one framework for understanding the relationship between neighborhood structural disadvantage and adolescent dating violence. Another explanation to the association between concentrated disadvantage and dating violence may be that individuals within areas of disadvantage are at a higher risk for exposure to risk factors for dating violence, including being exposed to community violence, interpersonal violence, and traumatic stress (Benson, Fox, DeMaris, & Van Wyk, ; Black et al., ; Jaggers et al., ; Voith & Brondino, ). In addition, these structural neighborhood characteristics may impede the values and norms of a community: violence may be seen as expected, tolerated or necessary (Berg et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, adolescence is an important developmental period to consider the influence of neighborhoods, as youth spend an increasing amount of time in social contexts outside of their home (Leventhal, Depéré, & Brooks‐Gunn, ). Neighborhood structural characteristics (e.g., economic disadvantage) and social processes (e.g., social connection) influence adolescent engagement in risk‐related behaviors, educational outcomes, and physical and mental health outcomes, including traumatic stress (Jaggers, Prattini, & Church, ; Leventhal & Brooks‐Gunn, ; Leventhal et al., ). Structural characteristics of disadvantage, including economic status, residential mobility and family disruption, have consistently been associated with higher levels of violent outcomes in urban youth and adults (Romero, Richards, Harrison, Garbarino, & Mozley, ; Voith & Brondino, ).…”
Section: Neighborhoods and Adolescent Dating Violencementioning
The link between relationship violence and aspects of neighborhood concentrated disadvantage (e.g., percent of unemployed adults, percent of families below poverty level), has been established. However, the literature examining neighborhood social processes, including informal social control and social cohesion, in relation to adolescent dating violence has shown mixed results with a limited theoretical foundation and methodology. Using a social disorganization theoretical framework, this study examined the mediating role of these neighborhood social processes in the relation between concentrated disadvantage and adolescent dating violence within an urban context. Participants included 605 adult residents in 30 census tracts and 203 adolescents from neighborhoods on the West and South sides of Chicago. Neighborhood-level concentrated disadvantage was measured via Census data, adult residents reported on neighborhood social processes, and youth reported on dating violence. Informal social control was negatively associated with dating violence, and social cohesion was positively associated with dating violence. A multilevel mediation model showed that concentrated disadvantage was related to higher levels of dating violence via lower levels of informal social control. These results extend social disorganization theory to dating violence within an urban context, while also highlighting the important role of neighborhood processes on relationship violence. Implications for research and intervention programming are discussed.
“…Another research has shown that teenagers who view their closest friends as deviant are likelier to participate in delinquency (Rokven et al, 2017), increasing their propensity to protest, stone pelting in Kashmir and delinquency in Jammu (Mathur, 2016; Khanna et al, 2020). Neighbourhood, peers and exposure to various conflict-related factors affect children’s mental health (Jaggers et al, 2016). They are owing to low academic performance and a lack of rapport between teachers and adolescents (Suri, 2014; Malla, 2019; Dar & Deb, 2020).…”
Background: Due to the Jammu and Kashmir conflict, many teenagers are involved in disputes with the law. The conflict made generations suffer for decades. Such children made the mobs; being involved in life-threatening situations and the risk they confront develop psychiatric disorders. As a result of the various tense conditions when applied in multiple anti-social activities, aberrant children sent to correctional homes have to encounter numerous psychological disorders.
Aim: The motive of the study is to explore the level of awareness, availability of services, stigma and obstacles to seeking assistance.
Method: Due to the open-ended interview questions and a small sample size of 15 respondents, this study employed a qualitative methodology – a thematic analysis was done.
Results: The findings revealed that, although the stigma is not publicly acknowledged, children who break the law and seek mental health services (MHS) are stigmatised. It was also shown that minor offenders fear that when they receive services provided by the staff of the observation home (OH), there will be a violation of their privacy and fear unforeseen repercussions.
Conclusion: Collaborative action must proactively raise appropriate awareness to lessen the stigma linked with mental health problems, especially regarding MHS among these teenagers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.