2009
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.91b6.22140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus sustained at birth

Abstract: We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of six patients who had sustained traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus at birth. The correct diagnosis was made from plain radiographs and often supplemented with ultrasonography, MRI and arthrography. An orthopaedic surgeon saw two patients within two days of birth, and the other four were seen at between nine and 30 days. The two neonates underwent unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction. In the remaining patients, seen after the age … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some case reports or small case series have already been published; however, precise epidemiological data lack [1][2][3][4]. In a retrospective analysis of 105,119 births, 789 (0.75 %) of the neonates were found to have a fracture, but only one patient (0.0001 %) had a transphyseal fracture of the humerus [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some case reports or small case series have already been published; however, precise epidemiological data lack [1][2][3][4]. In a retrospective analysis of 105,119 births, 789 (0.75 %) of the neonates were found to have a fracture, but only one patient (0.0001 %) had a transphyseal fracture of the humerus [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk factors for physeal injuries are difficult and instrumental deliveries, abnormal presentations, macrosomia and cephalopelvic disproportion. In our case, the neonate did not have history of birth trauma, child abuse or any obvious cause for the injury as against most of the previously reported cases, by Sherr Lurie N, Jacobsen S and Kaushal R, in which difficult labour or traction/ rotatory forces to the elbow was the cause for the injuries/ fracture [2,6,7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Detailed examination of our child did not have any evidence of nerve injury. In a case series of six patients diagnosed with this fracture studied by Jacobsen S et al, the age of diagnosis varied from day one to thirty of life with majority being diagnosed late [6]. Our patient's diagnosis was established on day 14 of life when radiograph/ ultrasound revealed callus formation, though clinically the child had presented on day one of life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classic but relatively uncommon radiographic fi nding is displacement of the epiphysis without an osseous fracture. This may be seen in infants with traumatic separation of the distal humerus, which usually results in posteromedial displacement of the distal fragment [ 19 ] ( Fig. 17.16 ) (see Chap.…”
Section: Classifi Cation Of Growth Plate Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%