2019
DOI: 10.14444/6009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic Fracture of the Pediatric Cervical Spine: Etiology, Epidemiology, Concurrent Injuries, and an Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes Using the Kids' Inpatient Database

Abstract: Background: The study aimed to characterize trends in incidence, etiology, fracture types, surgical procedures, complications, and concurrent injuries associated with traumatic pediatric cervical fracture using a nationwide database. Methods: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried. Trauma cases from 2003 to 2012 were identified, and cervical fracture patients were isolated. Demographics, etiologies, fracture levels, procedures, complications, and concurrent injuries were assessed. The t-tests elucidate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, a higher frequency of cervical spine fractures was noted in adolescents. These findings are comparable to Poorman et al and Shin et al, but are contrary to the findings of Compagnon et al and Mahan et al, who reported a tendency of cervical spine injuries in younger children [ 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population and inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, a higher frequency of cervical spine fractures was noted in adolescents. These findings are comparable to Poorman et al and Shin et al, but are contrary to the findings of Compagnon et al and Mahan et al, who reported a tendency of cervical spine injuries in younger children [ 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population and inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population and inclusion criteria. Poorman et al only referred to cervical spine fractures in their study reporting a higher prevalence of cervical spine fractures in adolescents (ages 11–18 years) and young adults (ages 19–20 years) [ 21 ]. The inclusion criteria of Compagnon et al and Mahan et al contained not only vertebral fractures, but also ligamentous injuries of the paediatric cervical spine [ 18 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have found associations with cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age. 26,31,34,36,38 This finding is in part attributable to the higher fulcrum, larger head, and unfused synchondroses commonly at the site of the dens in younger children. 4 As children get older and their cervical spines stabilize, it becomes more common to see thoracolumbar injuries as they become adolescents and adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High mortality rates (ranging between 16% and 18%) are reported for children. Frequently they are associated with a trauma of the cervical spine, especially its upper portion [13][14][15][16]. The leading causes of death comprise respiratory problems, cardiovascular disorders, thromboembolic events, infectious complications, and suicides [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%