Objectives
Ambulatory assessment data collection methods are increasingly used
to study behavior, experiences, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) such as
emotions, cognitions, and symptoms in clinical samples. Data collected close
in time at frequent and fixed intervals can assess PROs that are discrete or
changing rapidly and provide information about temporal dynamics or
mechanisms of change in clinical samples and individuals, but clinical
researchers have not yet routinely and systematically investigated the
reliability and validity of such measures or their potential added value
over conventional measures. The present study provides a comprehensive,
systematic evaluation of the psychometrics of several Proximal Intensive
Assessment (PIA) measures in a clinical sample and investigates whether PIA
appears to assess meaningful differences in phenomena over time.
Methods
Data was collected on a variety of psychopathology constructs on
handheld devices every 4 hours for 7 days from 62 adults recently exposed to
traumatic injury of themselves or a family member. Data was also collected
on standard self-report measures of the same constructs at the time of
enrollment, one week after enrollment, and two months after injury.
Results
For all measure scores, results showed good internal consistency
across items and within persons over time, provided evidence of convergent,
divergent, and construct validity, and showed significant between and
within-subject variability.
Conclusions
Results indicate that PIA measures can provide valid measurement of
psychopathology in a clinical sample. PIA may be useful to study mechanisms
of change in clinical contexts, identify targets for change, and gauge
treatment progress.