2014
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2013.13248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a review of CT signs and the difference between blunt and penetrating injury

Abstract: ORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE We aimed to present the frequency of computed tomography (CT) signs of diaphragmatic rupture and the differences between blunt and penetrating trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe CT scans of 23 patients with surgically proven diaphragmatic tears (both blunt and penetrating) were retrospectively reviewed for previously described CT signs of diaphragmatic injuries. The overall frequency of CT signs was reported; frequency of signs in right-and left-sided injuries and blunt and penetrating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
63
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 summarizes the most recent TDI studies from different countries [1,3,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, we may underestimate the incidence of TDI as the majority of mild (missed) or severe (died before diagnosis) lesions can be difficult to diagnose or because of the unavailability of routine postmortem examination in the state of Qatar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the most recent TDI studies from different countries [1,3,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, we may underestimate the incidence of TDI as the majority of mild (missed) or severe (died before diagnosis) lesions can be difficult to diagnose or because of the unavailability of routine postmortem examination in the state of Qatar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] In addition, it has been reported that this sign is specific for blunt traumas rather than penetrating traumas. [2,3] A good agreement was found between CT signs and operative findings in all cases with a clearly visualized defect. A diaphragmatic injury extending to both sides of diaphragm was detected (contiguous injury sign) in seventeen patients with a diaphragmatic defect that was later repaired.…”
Section: İlhan Et Al Role Of Computed Tomography In Detecting Penetrmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture are 61% to 87% and 72% to 100%, respectively. [3] Previous studies have reported various CT signs facilitating the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries. Discontinuous diaphragm sign, thickening of the diaphragm, hypoattenuated diaphragm, dependent viscera sign, dangling diaphragm sign, collar sign, contiguous injury sign, sinus cut-off sign, and diaphragmatic/peridiaphragmatic contrast extravasation are the well-defined CT signs of blunt and penetrating traumas.…”
Section: Management Of Patients With Minimal or Asymptomatic Left Thomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations