2008
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s1985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic brain injury: future assessment tools and treatment prospects

Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widespread and leads to death and disability in millions of individuals around the world each year. Overall incidence and prevalence of TBI are likely to increase in absolute terms in the future. Tackling the problem of treating TBI successfully will require improvements in the understanding of normal cerebral anatomy, physiology, and function throughout the lifespan, as well as the pathological and recuperative responses that result from trauma. New treatment approaches and com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is currently much interest in potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy in TBI (reviewed in Dash et al 2010), but this research is still in its infancy. State-of-the art neuroimaging techniques have great potential to facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning (Flanagan et al 2008; Kinnunen et al 2011), but multiple challenges, such as variations in clinical samples, study paradigms, and technical aspects of data collection, limit the clinical use and interpretation of current findings (Brenner 2011). Additional research is also needed to elucidate the neural bases of blast-induced neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric deficits, and the mechanisms of change associated with natural recovery and cognitive rehabilitation treatments (Cicerone et al 2011; M.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently much interest in potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy in TBI (reviewed in Dash et al 2010), but this research is still in its infancy. State-of-the art neuroimaging techniques have great potential to facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning (Flanagan et al 2008; Kinnunen et al 2011), but multiple challenges, such as variations in clinical samples, study paradigms, and technical aspects of data collection, limit the clinical use and interpretation of current findings (Brenner 2011). Additional research is also needed to elucidate the neural bases of blast-induced neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric deficits, and the mechanisms of change associated with natural recovery and cognitive rehabilitation treatments (Cicerone et al 2011; M.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the mechanistic heterogeneity and individual characteristics of TBI in addition to inconsistent randomized controlled clinical trials have led to a surprising lack of mainstream pharmacological treatments and limited translational applicability of findings from experimental TBI into clinical practice. [12][13][14][15] Clinical and pre-clinical evidence has linked biochemical disruptions involving the cholinergic system to the pathology and symptoms of TBI. 13,[16][17][18][19][20] Specifically, brain regions known to play a pivotal role in attention, spatial learning and memory, storage and retrieval of salient information, which also receive rich cholinergic innervations, such as the hippocampus and frontal cortex, are often disrupted in clinical or experimental TBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the diversity of TBI-related challenges, treatment typically needs to be multimodal [32], and some medications or pharmacological combinations may exacerbate or create symptoms. Furthermore, the evidence base for pharmacological and behavioral treatment of chronic TBI is still quite limited [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%