2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfcj.12052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trauma‐Informed Approaches to Juvenile Justice: A Critical Race Perspective

Abstract: Youth of color experience disproportionate juvenile justice contact and recidivism. Trauma‐informed approaches may provide important support to these youth and improve their future outcomes. This paper describes dynamics of the various levels of the juvenile justice system (i.e., police contact, courts, correctional placement, aftercare) that perpetuate psychological trauma among adjudicated youth of color. This paper explores trauma‐informed approaches from a critical race theory perspective to address issues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty-two full-text records were reviewed, of which 42 were excluded, leaving a total of 10 publications selected for inclusion (denoted by an asterisk in the References ). The 42 excluded full-text records included 15 publications that called for TIC in juvenile justice but did not provide a definition or detailed recommendations (e.g., Ko et al, 2008), six publications that discussed trauma screening/treatment only (e.g., Igelman, Ryan, Gilbert, Bashant, & North, 2008), and five publications that cited someone else’s definition of TIC (e.g., Crosby, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-two full-text records were reviewed, of which 42 were excluded, leaving a total of 10 publications selected for inclusion (denoted by an asterisk in the References ). The 42 excluded full-text records included 15 publications that called for TIC in juvenile justice but did not provide a definition or detailed recommendations (e.g., Ko et al, 2008), six publications that discussed trauma screening/treatment only (e.g., Igelman, Ryan, Gilbert, Bashant, & North, 2008), and five publications that cited someone else’s definition of TIC (e.g., Crosby, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we believe some of the injustices perpetrated by the U.S. government against children placed in Customs and Border Protection custody, including the violation of children's rights to security, health, and freedom from all forms of violence, could have been prevented through trauma-informed education among border personnel. The area of training and capacity-building for law enforcement staff working with minor asylum seekers is underdeveloped and understudied; however, promising models can be adopted from the juvenile justice system [55]. Neither costly nor time-consuming, training interventions have potential to improve children's treatment by law enforcement staff in a short timeframe.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may include a shift from a punitive to a more rehabilitative philosophy (Crosby, 2016). To do this the system must create an organized assessment and intake process that are sensitive to trauma and that avoid re-traumatization, that identify trauma histories through screening, and ensuring that once identified, youth receive appropriate treatment (Crosby, 2016;Ford et al, 2006). Implementing changes may require organizational oversight to ensure quality assurance for practice changes as well as incentives and reinforcement to ensure sustainability of practice changes (Berliner & Kolko, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may include a shift from a punitive to a more rehabilitative philosophy (Crosby, 2016). To do this the system must create an organized assessment and intake process that are sensitive to trauma and that avoid re-traumatization, that identify trauma histories through screening, and ensuring that once identified, youth receive appropriate treatment (Crosby, 2016;Ford et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation