2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
48
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, though individuals typically avoid harming outgroup members financially when other alternatives are available (De Dreu et al, 2010;Halevy et al, 2008;Halevy, Weisel, & Bornstein, 2012), experiencing relative deprivation increases the propensity of individuals in economically disadvantaged groups to harm members of economically advantaged outgroups financially (Halevy, Chou, Cohen, & Bornstein, 2010). Intergroup situations that involve direct threat to group interests (e.g., war, strike/lockout, sport competitions between rival clubs) may promote both the propensity to harm outgroup members and the perceived appropriateness of publicly displaying hostility toward outgroup members (Bornstein, 2003;Cottrell & Neuberg, 2005;Duckitt & Fisher, 2003;Kilduff, Elfenbein, & Staw, 2010;Weisel & B€ ohm, 2015;Wolf, Insko, Kirchner, & Wildschut, 2008;Yip, Schweitzer, & Nurmohamed, 2018).…”
Section: Pressing Research Questions and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, though individuals typically avoid harming outgroup members financially when other alternatives are available (De Dreu et al, 2010;Halevy et al, 2008;Halevy, Weisel, & Bornstein, 2012), experiencing relative deprivation increases the propensity of individuals in economically disadvantaged groups to harm members of economically advantaged outgroups financially (Halevy, Chou, Cohen, & Bornstein, 2010). Intergroup situations that involve direct threat to group interests (e.g., war, strike/lockout, sport competitions between rival clubs) may promote both the propensity to harm outgroup members and the perceived appropriateness of publicly displaying hostility toward outgroup members (Bornstein, 2003;Cottrell & Neuberg, 2005;Duckitt & Fisher, 2003;Kilduff, Elfenbein, & Staw, 2010;Weisel & B€ ohm, 2015;Wolf, Insko, Kirchner, & Wildschut, 2008;Yip, Schweitzer, & Nurmohamed, 2018).…”
Section: Pressing Research Questions and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Tabela 3 mostra que há, consistentemente, condições antecedentes manipuladas nos estudos analisados: possibilidade de conversar antes e durante o experimento (Yip, Schweitzer, & Nurmohamed, 2018); informações sobre pertencer ou não a um grupo (Engelmann et al, 2018), ou seja, ser designado a um grupo específico antes de iniciar o experimento (Jordan et al, 2014) ou saber qual a nacionalidade do outro participante ; informações sobre as regras do jogo/tarefa (Parks et al, 2017); informações sobre qual será a escolha de outras pessoas (Gallo & Yan, 2015); perguntas sobre características pessoais do próprio participante antes de iniciar o jogo (Baader & Vostroknutov, 2017); informação sobre a possibilidade de o comportamento ser punido ou não no futuro (Grieco, Faillo, & Zarri, 2017); bem como presença de observadores . Uma mesma categoria nessa tabela pode indicar diferentes manipulações, como a categoria informações sobre o jogo/tarefa, que engloba manipulações que informaram aos participantes sobre a matriz de consequências (Hillenbrand & Winter, 2018), ou se o parceiro de jogo era o computador ou outra pessoa (Cox, Karam, & Murphy, 2017), ou mesmo sobre a quantidade de tentativas do jogo (Krockow, Colman, & Pulford, 2018), entre outras.…”
Section: Manipulações Experimentais: Construção De História Antecedeunclassified
“…Other empirical work suggested that the experience of rivalry promoted unethical behavior in both laboratory and field settings, such as soccer games (Kistruck et al 2016). A laboratory study pointed out that trash-talking can trigger perceptions of rivalry and motivate destructive and unethical behavior hindering creative performance (Yip et al 2018). Behavioral dynamics that characterize rivalry such as the devaluation of others, striving for supremacy, and aggressive reactions should be most detrimental in the context of close intra-team relationships that necessitate mutual respect, equality, and warmth (Back et al 2013).…”
Section: Rivalry In Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rivalry is conceptualized as a relational construct (Kilduff et al 2010;Kilduff 2014) and considering its behavioral consequences (Kistruck et al 2016;Yip et al 2018), we argue that in collaborative team settings rivalry is included within the specter of negative relations within teams. Negative relations within the team have a damaging effect on performance, because they block communication, reduce interaction instances and create a dysfunctional team environment where team members obstruct each other's task related efforts (de Jong et al 2014).…”
Section: Rivalry Team Learning Behaviors and Team Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation