2015
DOI: 10.1086/683198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trash Talk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also is important to acknowledge sociopolitical historical processes that result in substantial power differential between the majority group and minority populations. For instance, an ethnographic inquiry of the Bedouins in the south of Israel has concluded that trash talk, which views the Bedouins as disordered and dirty, forms a basis for the perspective of the Bedouins as a group that needs to be removed or reformed ( McKee, 2015 ). On average, the majority group of veteran Israeli older persons is more prosperous than the other three groups examined in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also is important to acknowledge sociopolitical historical processes that result in substantial power differential between the majority group and minority populations. For instance, an ethnographic inquiry of the Bedouins in the south of Israel has concluded that trash talk, which views the Bedouins as disordered and dirty, forms a basis for the perspective of the Bedouins as a group that needs to be removed or reformed ( McKee, 2015 ). On average, the majority group of veteran Israeli older persons is more prosperous than the other three groups examined in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18, n. 5]. In that sense, the limits of the language of nature indications are truthful and constant [32], thus avoiding fallacious or interested interpretation [33]. These limits are based on the first principle of "do good and avoid evil", whose two parts correspond to the principles of "beneficence" and "non-maleficence" of contemporary bioethical and medical principles (namely beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice) [31].…”
Section: Analysis From the Limits Of The Language Of Naturementioning
confidence: 99%