2010
DOI: 10.2202/1944-2858.1053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traps, Pitfalls, and Unexpected Cliffs on the Path Out of Poverty

Abstract: A qualitative study was conducted to explore "cliff effects," the overall dip in household resources when working poor families become ineligible for government work supports. The study included a survey of 78 low-income women and 32 social service providers, followed by interviews with smaller subsets of each. We asked how low-income women who are either on the verge of government support loss or who have recently experienced government support loss manage this circumstance and explored the effects on familie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many participants attributed low household incomes to unstable employment, low wages and the “cliff effect” (Prenovost and Youngblood, 2010; Romich et al, 2007). “Cliff effects” occur when households become ineligible for safety net benefits despite not experiencing full economic self-sufficiency through employment, a circumstance described by one participant as a “catch-22.” Further, in comparison to other household expenses such as housing and food, utilities were often considered less of a priority and were handled with more flexibility because service interruptions take time to ensue and can be avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many participants attributed low household incomes to unstable employment, low wages and the “cliff effect” (Prenovost and Youngblood, 2010; Romich et al, 2007). “Cliff effects” occur when households become ineligible for safety net benefits despite not experiencing full economic self-sufficiency through employment, a circumstance described by one participant as a “catch-22.” Further, in comparison to other household expenses such as housing and food, utilities were often considered less of a priority and were handled with more flexibility because service interruptions take time to ensue and can be avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People receiving SNAP report this steep drop off in benefits causes anxiety and high stress. 7 Phasing out benefits more slowly would reduce this “poverty trap” that makes it harder to escape food insecurity. A slower phase-out would also be more commensurate with the marginal federal tax rate on wage income for those with income levels typical of SNAP beneficiaries—whose highest tax bracket is typically 10% or 12%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, in the lived experience of communities interacting sets of policies from a spectrum of agencies form a "policy ecosystem". The "policy ecosystem" interacts with community realities, in the process shaping individual choices and lives, and creating barriers and exacerbating disparities [125].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%