2016
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/p04023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping in proton irradiated p+-n-n+silicon sensors at fluences anticipated at the HL-LHC outer tracker

Abstract: The degradation of signal in silicon sensors is studied under conditions expected at the CERN High-Luminosity LHC. 200 μm thick n-type silicon sensors are irradiated with protons of different energies to fluences of up to 3 · 1015 neq/cm2. Pulsed red laser light with a wavelength of 672 nm is used to generate electron-hole pairs in the sensors. The induced signals are used to determine the charge collection efficiencies separately for electrons and holes drifting through the sensor. The effective trapping rate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trapping rate (1/𝜏 𝑒 ) for electrons, indicated by simulation as the responsible for the majority of the collected charge, has been estimated using the data collected on IBL sensors during the bias voltage scan perfomed at the beginning of Run 3 in 2022. Fits to the cluster charge and to the slope of the increase of this charge with the applied bias voltage (HV) above the point of depletion give results in good agreement with the values used in the radiation damage digitiser, based on previous measurements [14][15][16]. The evolution of the computed electric field profile and (Right) Electron trapping rate (1/𝜏 𝑒 ) estimated from fits to the cluster charge (filled squares) and to the slope of the cluster charge increase with the applied bias voltage above depletion (filled circles) as a function of the fluence on IBL sensors.…”
Section: Marco Battagliasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The trapping rate (1/𝜏 𝑒 ) for electrons, indicated by simulation as the responsible for the majority of the collected charge, has been estimated using the data collected on IBL sensors during the bias voltage scan perfomed at the beginning of Run 3 in 2022. Fits to the cluster charge and to the slope of the increase of this charge with the applied bias voltage (HV) above the point of depletion give results in good agreement with the values used in the radiation damage digitiser, based on previous measurements [14][15][16]. The evolution of the computed electric field profile and (Right) Electron trapping rate (1/𝜏 𝑒 ) estimated from fits to the cluster charge (filled squares) and to the slope of the cluster charge increase with the applied bias voltage above depletion (filled circles) as a function of the fluence on IBL sensors.…”
Section: Marco Battagliasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In a more recent work focusing on high-fluence irradiations, deviations from the linear behavior shown in Fig. 11 for particle fluences mentioned above about 3 × 10 14 n eq cm −2 were reported [60]. The inverse trapping time (trapping rate) increased slower than expected from the linear extrapolation from low-fluence data and gave, e.g., a 2-3 times lower value at 3 × 10 15 n eq cm −2 .…”
Section: E Charge Carrier Trappingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The relation between the basic defect parameters (electron and hole cross sections, position in the bandgap, charge states, and concentration) and the macroscopic detector properties (space charge, generation current, and trapping) was already discussed in Section I-D. We furthermore distinguish between point defects and extended defects (or cluster defects). Irradiation with 60 Co-gammas or low-energy electrons up to some MeV can only lead to single atom displacements, and thus to the creation of point defects only. Irradiation with neutrons leads predominantly to defect clusters and a few point defects.…”
Section: B Point and Cluster Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[40]. With increasing fluence, trapping effects [41,42] become more and more dominant and hole collection (at p-type strips) is a clear disadvantage due to the much lower mobility and therefore longer drift time of the holes. In figure 8 a lower seed signal is observed for n-in-p type sensors at the first irradiation step of 3 × 10 14 n eq /cm 2 , which is due to wider clusters in those sensors resulting in a smaller seed signal.…”
Section: Charge Collection and Noisementioning
confidence: 99%