2014
DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2014.943366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping Effects and Fisheries Research: A Case Study of Sockeye Salmon in the Wenatchee River, USA

Abstract: Trapping facilities are regularly used to achieve a variety of fishery research and management goals. Though care of sampled organisms is a central tenet of most agencies, the effects of trapping on fish behavior are seldom quantified. We used passive integrated transponder technology to calculate passage delay and blockage of adult Sockeye Salmon at a facility where all spring‐migrating fishes were trapped for research between 2008 and 2010. Median passage delay ranged from 0.4 to 8.7 days, and 8% to 38% of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is limited information on how trapping affects migration timing and survival in existing trap-and-haul programs, but several studies (e.g., Bromaghin et al 2007;Marauskas et al 2014;Morrisett et al 2018) have evaluated these factors in other settings and provide useful insights. Murauskas et al (2014) evaluated passage delay and blockage of adult sockeye salmon at a combined passage and trapping facility on the Wenatchee River, Washington, in 2008-2012. Trapping operations occurred 7 days per week in 2008-2010 and median passage delay ranged from 0.4 to 8.7 days while an estimated 8-38% of the returning adults were prevented from migrating upstream past the trap (Murauskas et al 2014).…”
Section: Biological Responses To Trap-and-haulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information on how trapping affects migration timing and survival in existing trap-and-haul programs, but several studies (e.g., Bromaghin et al 2007;Marauskas et al 2014;Morrisett et al 2018) have evaluated these factors in other settings and provide useful insights. Murauskas et al (2014) evaluated passage delay and blockage of adult sockeye salmon at a combined passage and trapping facility on the Wenatchee River, Washington, in 2008-2012. Trapping operations occurred 7 days per week in 2008-2010 and median passage delay ranged from 0.4 to 8.7 days while an estimated 8-38% of the returning adults were prevented from migrating upstream past the trap (Murauskas et al 2014).…”
Section: Biological Responses To Trap-and-haulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), while intensive trapping rates at Tumwater Dam substantially delayed or altogether precluded Wenatchee River basin Sockeye Salmon from migrating to spawning grounds (Murauskas et al. ). On the Yukon River, trap holding time at an in‐river fish wheel reduced upstream migration success for Chum Salmon O. keta (Bromaghin et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and adult passage behavior and performance have been studied at length (Roscoe and Hinch ), limitations in monitoring upstream migration have hindered evaluations of the postpassage effects of passage route through these facilities (Roscoe and Hinch ) or interception and handling at these facilities (Murauskas et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trap and truck programmes may be fraught with problems as fish may have difficulties finding the entrance to the trap, resulting in delays (Murauskas et al, 2014). Further, there is stress associated with being caught in a trap, and the handling and transportation of the fish may also cause injuries and in extreme cases spawning failure after release (Jokikokko, 2002;Portz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%