1989
DOI: 10.2307/1564032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping Boiga irregularis on Guam Using Bird Odors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also recorded the greatest increase in small mammal encounters along forest edges, although rat encounters were also high in the forest interior. Snakes use multiple sensory modalities to locate prey 64 , 65 and may have selected edge habitats as good locations to locate prey. Laboratory and field experiments on BTS demonstrated that the combination of olfactory and visual cues created the strongest orientation response compared to either of these cues alone 66 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also recorded the greatest increase in small mammal encounters along forest edges, although rat encounters were also high in the forest interior. Snakes use multiple sensory modalities to locate prey 64 , 65 and may have selected edge habitats as good locations to locate prey. Laboratory and field experiments on BTS demonstrated that the combination of olfactory and visual cues created the strongest orientation response compared to either of these cues alone 66 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Although bird odour does attract BTS (Fritts et al 1989), testing has shown that traps with live mice are more effective than traps baited with live quail or soiled bedding (Rodda et al 1999), potentially because mice are active at night when BTS are foraging. Yackel Adams et al (2019) also found that mouselure traps had a higher overall CPUE than bird-lure traps on Guam when deployed together in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical approach for synthetic brown tree snake attractants in the present study is similar to other studies and all have produced disappointing results. Attractiveness of several agents, including major components of carrion odor such as cadaverine and putrescine, predator lures, bird odors, rotten eggs, and rotten milk, is low (Chiszar et al 1997, Clark 1997, Fritts et al 1989, Shivik 1999, Shivik and Clark 1999a. It is highly unlikely that a single chemical will be found to be an attractant for snakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%