Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Vehicle underbody longitudinal vortices can have a significant effect on the aerodynamic loads experienced by a body in close ground proximity. A series of wind tunnel tests at a nominal Reynolds number of 2.26 x 10 6 ,were carried out to investigate both (i) the influence of a moving ground plane simulation compared to fixed ground and (ii) the effect of relative location and strength of underbody longitudinal vortices on a simple flat plate, at zero incidence, fitted with vane vortex generators. The presence of vortices between the plate and the ground plane serve to reduce the local pressure and generate a negative lift on the plate. The data indicate that an increase in vortex strength (proportional to an increase in vane vortex generator angle, β) increases plate negative-lift coefficient (C L . The lift coefficient becomes more negative with decreasing ground clearance (h/c) for all cases except those for which there is evidence of vortex breakdown (high vane angles and low ground clearance). The variation of negative-lift-to-drag coefficient ratio shows that the overall aerodynamic efficiency is greater for smaller vortex generator angles atthe lowest ground clearances. The pitching moment coefficient was found to change from nose down to nose up as ground proximity reduced indicating a movement in the centre of pressure position towards the plate trailing edge. AR = Aspect ratio (d/H) β = Vortex generator angle (deg) C L = Lift coefficient C D = Drag coefficient C m = Pitching moment coefficient (+ve nose down, reference 30% chord) c = Chord (plate length 1m) d = Vortex generator spacing (mm) D = Drag (N) L = Lift (N) H = Height of vortex generator (25mm) h = vertical distance between plate and ground (m) I = Turbulence Intensity L/D = Lift to Drag Ratio μ = Viscosity (kg/ms) μ t = Turbulent viscosity (kg/ms) y = Lateral distance from plate centre line (m)
Vehicle underbody longitudinal vortices can have a significant effect on the aerodynamic loads experienced by a body in close ground proximity. A series of wind tunnel tests at a nominal Reynolds number of 2.26 x 10 6 ,were carried out to investigate both (i) the influence of a moving ground plane simulation compared to fixed ground and (ii) the effect of relative location and strength of underbody longitudinal vortices on a simple flat plate, at zero incidence, fitted with vane vortex generators. The presence of vortices between the plate and the ground plane serve to reduce the local pressure and generate a negative lift on the plate. The data indicate that an increase in vortex strength (proportional to an increase in vane vortex generator angle, β) increases plate negative-lift coefficient (C L . The lift coefficient becomes more negative with decreasing ground clearance (h/c) for all cases except those for which there is evidence of vortex breakdown (high vane angles and low ground clearance). The variation of negative-lift-to-drag coefficient ratio shows that the overall aerodynamic efficiency is greater for smaller vortex generator angles atthe lowest ground clearances. The pitching moment coefficient was found to change from nose down to nose up as ground proximity reduced indicating a movement in the centre of pressure position towards the plate trailing edge. AR = Aspect ratio (d/H) β = Vortex generator angle (deg) C L = Lift coefficient C D = Drag coefficient C m = Pitching moment coefficient (+ve nose down, reference 30% chord) c = Chord (plate length 1m) d = Vortex generator spacing (mm) D = Drag (N) L = Lift (N) H = Height of vortex generator (25mm) h = vertical distance between plate and ground (m) I = Turbulence Intensity L/D = Lift to Drag Ratio μ = Viscosity (kg/ms) μ t = Turbulent viscosity (kg/ms) y = Lateral distance from plate centre line (m)
Vortex generators (VG) are widely used in the aerospace industry, mainly to control boundary layer transition and to delay flow separations. A different type of VG is used on race cars for manipulating the flow over and under the vehicle, mainly to generate downforce (which is needed for better performance). Contrary to the VGs used on airplanes' wings, the VGs discussed here are much taller than the local boundary layer thickness and are not intended to control laminar to turbulent flow transition. Although, the effect of such VGs was studied in the past, not all features of the flow fields were documented. For example, the shape of the vortex wake behind a VG, the wake rollup and the resulting pressure signature is still not well understood. Consequently, this study investigates the above questions by using experimental methods. A generic model with several VGs was tested in a low speed wind tunnel and in addition to the lift and drag the surface pressure distribution and the trailing vortex signature behind the VGs were studied. In order to demonstrate the incremental effect of the vortex wake, airfoil shaped VGs were also tested, mainly to quantify the “blockage effect” between the plate and the ground plane. The effect of rake (vehicle's angle of attack), which was not documented in previous work, was also investigated here. The results of this study provide quantitative information on the expected loads and pressure distribution behind such large-scale VGs; data needed for the successful application of such devices to actual vehicles.
A ground-effect diffuser is an upward-sloping section of the underbody of a racing car that enhances aerodynamic performance by increasing the downforce, thus improving tire grip. The downforce generated by a diffuser can be increased by geometric modifications that facilitate passive flow control. Here, we modified a bluff body equipped with a 17deg diffuser ramp surface (the baseline/plane diffuser) to introduce a convex bump near the end of the ramp surface. The flow features, force, and surface pressure measurements determined in wind-tunnel experiments agreed with previous studies but the bump favorably altered the overall diffuser pressure recovery curve by increasing the flow velocity near the diffuser exit. This resulted in a static pressure drop near the diffuser exit followed by an increase to freestream static pressure, thus increasing the downforce across most of the ride heights we tested. We observed a maximum 4.9% increase in downforce when the modified diffuser was compared to the plane diffuser. The downforce increment declined as the ride height was gradually reduced to the low-downforce diffuser flow regime.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.