Trapped in a net: network analysis for network governance

Abstract

PurposeEspecially at the regional level co‐operation is seen as a prerequisite for innovation and competitiveness. Hence, political interest in fostering knowledge intensive networks is high. New forms of governance and additional strategic intelligence for decision makers are requested. Thus potential of the social network analysis (SNA) is discussed as methodology providing the information needed for strategic management of innovation networks. The aim of this paper is to assess the impact as a regional governance tool.Design/methodology/approachFirst, benefits and risks of innovation networks are discussed based on literature review. Second, the potentials of the SNA for their systematic monitoring are examined. Herewith specific attention was paid to the manageability and reduction of complexity to demonstrate SNA applicability for network governance. Analysis was based on automated data retrieval of electronic documents available, e.g. at governmental institutions, research databases, and the internet. Results are exemplified by studying knowledge intensive networks in Styria.FindingsThe applied set of IT based tools and visualisation of regional co‐operations based on SNA provides a comprehensive view of the interdependencies and the embeddedness of different institutions as well as actors of the region. Based on this visualisation conclusions are drawn concerning network management by analysing specific attributes of interest, concerning partners, cooperative behaviour, balance of power, openness and embeddedness of the network.Originality/valueNetwork benefits success may not be achieved automatically. Strategic management is crucial for success. The paper demonstrates how social network analysis may be applied on automatic retrieved data on involved organisations and key players to strengthening the strategic intelligence of (regional) decision makers and help them meet the governance challenges of the network economy.

Network (Mis)Alignment, Technology Policy and Innovation: The Tale of Two Brazilian Cities

“…There are some practical implications for policy; our results suggest that there is no one-sizefits-all network governance and structure, which is consistent with the findings from other studies of networks (e.g. Ahuja, 2000;Grasenick et al, 2008). The institutional, cultural and economic settings can differ among regions, and policy makers formulating policy to promote network formation to improve firms' innovation performance should be aware that reproducing the network governance and structure from successful regions may not be appropriate for (all) other regions.…”

Conditions for making strategic alliances: The case of two enterprises from the South Moravian Region

“…Despite many advantages that the strategic alliances off er there are also risks that must be considered (Grasenick et al, 2008). The risks of these business relationships should be defi ned alongside the benefi ts.…”

Community of Practice: A flexible construct for understanding SME networking roles in the Irish artisan cheese sector

“…The UCINET social network software package (Borgatti et al, 2002) was then utilized. As this was a full population study, a sociogram of the entire CoP was then constructed which demonstrated each members' incoming and outgoing ties (Gluckler and Doreian, 2016;Brusco et al, 2011;Grasenick et al, 2008). The results were then aggregated across all members in the CoP, enabling the identification of four distinct positional categories -isolate, leaf, mesh and super-node.…”