1980
DOI: 10.3133/ofr80735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trap-efficiency study, Highland Creek flood retarding reservoir near Kelseyville, California, water years 1966-77

Abstract: Introduction Characteristics of the dr ainage bas in Desc ription of reservoir and dam 4 Method o f investigation 4 Runoff 4 Suspended sediment 5 Reservoir surveys 7 Results of investigation 10 Runoff data 10 Sediment d at a II Rese rvoir survey da ta I2 Com put a ti on of tra p efficiency 14 Summ ary 14 References cited 14 FIGURES I. Ind ex map 2 2. M a p hawing location and features of High land Creek Re ervoi r and drai nage basin 3 3-6. Photog raph hawing: 3. Highl a nd Creek Dam and outlet st ructure 4 4.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following example from the report "Trap Efficiency Study, Highland Creek Flood-Retarding Reservoir near Kelseyville, California, Water Years 1966-67" by Trujillo (1982), demonstrates this rela-tionship between purpose, summary, and abstract. The summary section also is an example of a succinct and quantitative concluding statement.…”
Section: The Summary or Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following example from the report "Trap Efficiency Study, Highland Creek Flood-Retarding Reservoir near Kelseyville, California, Water Years 1966-67" by Trujillo (1982), demonstrates this rela-tionship between purpose, summary, and abstract. The summary section also is an example of a succinct and quantitative concluding statement.…”
Section: The Summary or Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The abstract by Trujillo (1982) on page 24, presented as an example under ' The summary and conclusions" section, is well written and provides an example of an abstract. Note the correlation of key concepts in the abstract to the purpose and the summary.…”
Section: The Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to acknowledge that the conceptdevelopment simulations reported herein could not be used to address every aspect of the modelling problem. Specifically, the effort reported here was neither Freeze (1971) Simulation of flow in earth dams US/DS C H Hammad (1972) River bed degradation DS C H/G Gregory and Park (1974) Channel capacity changes DS C H/G Baxter (1977) Environmental effects of dams US/DS C H/G/B/C Williams (1977) Channel sedimentation DS R H/G Graf (1980) Downstream rapids DS C H/G Parker (1980) Gravel-bed streams DS C H/G Beschta et al (1981) Sediment and controlled releases DS C H/G Trujillo (1982) Reservoir trap efficiency US C H/G Williams and Wolman (1984) Alluvial rivers DS C H/G Allen et al (1989) Bedrock fluvial systems DS C H/G Blodgett (1989) Channel hydraulics, incision US R H/G Simons and Simons (1991) Sediment problems US/DS R H/G Blanchard (1993) Groundwater fluctuations US/DS C H Gup (1994) Biological integrity US/DS C B Ligon et al (1995) Ecological effects, geomorphology DS C H/G/B Ziegler and Nisbet (1995) Modelling reservoir sediment US C H/G Power et al (1996) Biodiversity, food web impacts DS C H/G/B Watters (1996) Dams as barriers to aquatic fauna DS C B Collier et al (1997) Downstream dam impacts DS C H/G Nilsson et al (1997) Riverbank vegetation DS C H/B Hill et al (1998) Hydrologic modelling, vegetation US C H/B Graf (1999) Geographic census of dams US/DS C H/B Lenhart (2000) Impoundment hydrology, vegetation US R H/B Shields et al (2000) Channel migration DS C H/G Wohl and Cenderelli (2000) Reservoir sediment releases Bushaw-Newton et al (2002) Integrated ecological response US/DS R H/G/B Doyle et al (2002Doyle et al ( , 2003a Channel responses US/DS R H/G Pizzuto (2002) Fluvial geomorphology US/DS R H/G Poff and Hart (2002) Ecological classification of dams US/DS R H/G/B Nutrient retention in reservoirs U...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%