2022
DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.jns21894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transverse sinus stenting without surgical repair in idiopathic CSF rhinorrhea associated with transverse sinus stenoses: a pilot study

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Based on their clinical and radiological patterns, idiopathic CSF rhinorrhea and idiopathic intracranial hypertension can represent different clinical expressions of the same underlying pathological process. Transverse sinus stenoses are associated with both diseases, resulting in eventual restriction of the venous CSF outflow pathway. While venous sinus stenting has emerged as a promising treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension, its efficiency on idiopathic CSF leaks has not been very wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following an extensive systematic review, our patient's gradient pressure surpasses all others documented in the literature (Table). 3-52 According to our systematic review, the highest recorded gradient pressure was 67 mm Hg reported by Tschoe et al 36 who highlighted the impact of changes in mean arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide on venous sinus pressures in patients with IIH undergoing venous sinus stenting. Moreover, Ahmed et al reviewed clinical, venographic, and intracranial pressure data before and after stent placement in transverse sinus stenosis in 52 patients with IIH; the highest pressure gradient they reported was 41 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Following an extensive systematic review, our patient's gradient pressure surpasses all others documented in the literature (Table). 3-52 According to our systematic review, the highest recorded gradient pressure was 67 mm Hg reported by Tschoe et al 36 who highlighted the impact of changes in mean arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide on venous sinus pressures in patients with IIH undergoing venous sinus stenting. Moreover, Ahmed et al reviewed clinical, venographic, and intracranial pressure data before and after stent placement in transverse sinus stenosis in 52 patients with IIH; the highest pressure gradient they reported was 41 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, knowledge of the association between DVS narrowing and sCSF leak raises the possibility of finding a correctable underlying cause for sCSF leaks and foregoing these long‐term measures. In fact, DVS stenting as a stand‐alone treatment for sCSF leak with comorbid DVS narrowing has been reported 26,27 . More recently, Labeyrie et al published a retrospective case–control study evaluating the use of DVS stenting after repair of sCSF leak in patients with confirmed DVS narrowing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, DVS stenting as a stand‐alone treatment for sCSF leak with comorbid DVS narrowing has been reported. 26 , 27 More recently, Labeyrie et al published a retrospective case–control study evaluating the use of DVS stenting after repair of sCSF leak in patients with confirmed DVS narrowing. They found that DVS stenting resulted in significantly less recurrence of CSF leaks and trended toward less adjunctive treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilateral transverse venous sinus stenosis is a highly sensitive imaging marker of IIH found in almost all patients with IIH [ 6 ]; and venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as an effective alternative treatment for a subset of patients with medically refractive IIH [ 62 ]. Some institutions have incorporated VSS into the management of patients with spontaneous CSF leak, either as a standalone procedure or as an adjunct to surgical repair as part of the treatment for elevated ICP [ 58 , 63 ]. There is insufficient evidence to support this practice in all patients with spontaneous CSF leak.…”
Section: Spontaneous Skull Base Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakmentioning
confidence: 99%