1970
DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(70)90213-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transverse momentum transport in O2 gas under the influence of a magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expressions similar to (24), (25) with (28), (30) have been obtained previously 12 for the Senftlebeneffect 13 of the paramagnetic gas 02 subject to approximations referred to as the "uncoupled model". Next, the dependence of em on the magnitude H of the magnetic field and on the number density n is considered.…”
Section: Km = *And(«)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Expressions similar to (24), (25) with (28), (30) have been obtained previously 12 for the Senftlebeneffect 13 of the paramagnetic gas 02 subject to approximations referred to as the "uncoupled model". Next, the dependence of em on the magnitude H of the magnetic field and on the number density n is considered.…”
Section: Km = *And(«)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Also quite sensitive to the anisotropy are the transport property field-effect phenomena [32]. The analysis of measurements of this type is complicated by the 3E nature of the 02 molecule: a two-part structure has been observed [46] both for the shear viscosity and the thermal conductivity field-effects in pure 02. No measurements of the shear viscosity field-effects have been carried out for O2-Rg mixtures, and it is unlikely that they will be in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would seem to be closest in spirit to the energy sudden approximation would be to calculate all velocity averages of the energy-dependent cross sections CT as if the j states are degenerate (so y ' = y) and to obtain the energy inelasticity from the differences in the j-state Boltzmann factors in the gain and loss terms. The result of this procedure can be written in the general form (40) [(2L + 1)(2Z + l ) ] " ' P ( Z , L )~X j ' j ( Z i + 1)(2j' + 1) x I with X y j given in this approximation as XgG = 2[[pi'/(2j'+ 1)]1/2 -kj/(2j + I ) ]~/~] = This method is labeled DG as being the closest to treating the j states as being degenerate (DG).…”
Section: (35)mentioning
confidence: 99%